DetERminants and impact of diagnostic delay in people living with a RD in Spain

Introduction. According to the International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC), all known rare diseases (RD) should be diagnosable within a year. Therefore, to wait more than one year could be considered diagnosis delay. This project aims to know the overall figures of the diagnosis of people affected by a rare disease (RD) in Spain, the clinical determinants that increase the risk of having a delayed diagnosis and their psychological and social impact by comparing their situation with those in whom the diagnosis has arrived in one year or less. Materials and methods. A purpose-designed form from the Spanish RD Patient Registry for data-collection purposes was used. Three institutions linked to the RD collective in Spain collaborated in the study: IIER-ISCIII (research centre), FEDER (patient advocacy groups) and CREER (public administration). Results. Main results were published in three open access scientific articles: 56.4% of people had experienced delay in diagnosis of their RDs, being higher in women (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.45); those with symptom onset at age 30-44 years (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.19-1.84); and in mental and behavioural disorders (OR 4.21; 95% CI 2.26-7.85). Some determinants associated with experiencing DD were having to travel to see a specialist other than that usually consulted in the patient's home province (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.9); or visiting more than 10 specialists (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.7-4.0). People who underwent DD experienced greater psychological and social impact than those diagnosed within the first year of disease (36.2% vs 23.2% needed psychological care; p = 0.002). Conclusion. These findings provide insight into the determinants that have the greatest influence on delayed diagnosis. It will also contribute to develop recommendations to reduce the time required to obtain a diagnosis, as well as correct social inequalities and improve the quality of life of people who live with a RD. Key messages. More than half of people with rare diseases in Spain experience diagnostic delay, especially women and those with mental and behavioural disorders Having to travel to see different specialists outside the home province and consulting many specialists increase the risk of diagnostic delay Diagnostic delay is associated with greater psychological and social impact, increasing the need for psychological care

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23695401
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DetERminants and impact of diagnostic delay in people living with a RD in Spain

Greta Arias-Merino, Juan Benito-Lozano, Begoña Ruiz García, Verónica Alonso‐Ferreira et al.
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

DetERminants and impact of diagnostic delay in people living with a RD in Spain

Greta Arias-Merino, Juan Benito-Lozano, Begoña Ruiz García, Verónica Alonso‐Ferreira, Beatriz Arconada-López, Mario Gómez-Martínez
article en

Abstract

Introduction. According to the International Rare Diseases Research Consortium (IRDiRC), all known rare diseases (RD) should be diagnosable within a year. Therefore, to wait more than one year could be considered diagnosis delay. This project aims to know the overall figures of the diagnosis of people affected by a rare disease (RD) in Spain, the clinical determinants that increase the risk of having a delayed diagnosis and their psychological and social impact by comparing their situation with those in whom the diagnosis has arrived in one year or less. Materials and methods. A purpose-designed form from the Spanish RD Patient Registry for data-collection purposes was used. Three institutions linked to the RD collective in Spain collaborated in the study: IIER-ISCIII (research centre), FEDER (patient advocacy groups) and CREER (public administration). Results. Main results were published in three open access scientific articles: 56.4% of people had experienced delay in diagnosis of their RDs, being higher in women (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.07-1.45); those with symptom onset at age 30-44 years (OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.19-1.84); and in mental and behavioural disorders (OR 4.21; 95% CI 2.26-7.85). Some determinants associated with experiencing DD were having to travel to see a specialist other than that usually consulted in the patient's home province (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.6-2.9); or visiting more than 10 specialists (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.7-4.0). People who underwent DD experienced greater psychological and social impact than those diagnosed within the first year of disease (36.2% vs 23.2% needed psychological care; p = 0.002). Conclusion. These findings provide insight into the determinants that have the greatest influence on delayed diagnosis. It will also contribute to develop recommendations to reduce the time required to obtain a diagnosis, as well as correct social inequalities and improve the quality of life of people who live with a RD. Key messages. More than half of people with rare diseases in Spain experience diagnostic delay, especially women and those with mental and behavioural disorders Having to travel to see different specialists outside the home province and consulting many specialists increase the risk of diagnostic delay Diagnostic delay is associated with greater psychological and social impact, increasing the need for psychological care

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Federación Española de Enfermedades Raras (ES), Instituto de Investigación de Enfermedades Raras (ES), Instituto de Mayores y Servicios Sociales (ES)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon