Plastic mulching consistently improves brinjal performance, but drip irrigation benefits are soil dependent: A two-location field study

Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) requires considerable soil moisture throughout its life cycle, therefore, its cultivation in water constraint area is difficult. Though different soil moisture conservation technologies and lower water use irrigation systems have been developed for crop cultivation, their successful deployment largely depends on the locality, especially on soil characteristics. This study evaluated the effects of irrigation regimes, mulching practices, and their combination on growth, stress physiology and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of brinjal across two field locations with contrasting soil conditions. Location 1 had coarser soil, lower nutrient and organic matter content profiles and lower water-holding capacity than location 2. The experiment comprised three irrigation levels [rainfed (I0), conventional furrow irrigation (IC), and drip irrigation (ID)] and three mulching treatments [no mulch (M0), straw mulch (MS), and plastic mulch (MP)] with three replications at both locations. Irrigation and mulching both significantly influenced growth, stress indicators, fruit yield, and IWUE, though the effects of the treatment on these parameters varied between locations. At Location 1, drip irrigation (ID) produced a fruit yield of 8.90 ± 5.68 t ha-1, with considerable variability among replicates, and did not differ significantly (p = 0.88) from conventional furrow irrigation (IC) or the rainfed treatment (I0). In contrast, at location 2, drip irrigation outperformed (21.88 ± 9.44 t ha-1) other treatments, being 117% and 32% higher than I0 and IC, respectively. Plastic mulching (MP) improved growth, reduced drought stress and increased yield compared to MS and M0 at both locations. The highest yield at location 1 (23.18 ± 6.62 t ha-1) occurred under IC × MP, while the highest yield at location 2 (32.93 ± 1.62 t ha-1) was achieved under ID × MP. IWUE peaked at 38.84 kg ha-1 mm-1 (IC × MP) in location 1 and 65.87 kg ha-1 mm-1 (ID × MP) in location 2. A linear mixed model estimated that plastic mulch increased yield by ~10.63 t ha-1 (95% CI: 6.58-14.68 t ha-1, p < 0.001) over no mulch, and IC × MP produced a synergistic yield gain of 11.03 t ha-1 (95% CI: 5.3-16.76 t ha-1, p = 0.003) over the control. Overall, plastic mulching consistently enhanced brinjal performance, while the benefit of drip irrigation was soil-dependent and was most evident in the higher water-retention field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360413
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plastic mulching consistently improves brinjal performance, but drip irrigation benefits are soil dependent: A two-location field study

FM Jamil Uddin, Md Harun Rashid, Swapan Kumar Paul, Tamara M. Jackson et al.
1 links
PLoS ONE
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

Plastic mulching consistently improves brinjal performance, but drip irrigation benefits are soil dependent: A two-location field study

FM Jamil Uddin, Md Harun Rashid, Swapan Kumar Paul, Tamara M. Jackson, Pallab Goswami, Md. Nayan, Pronomi Paul Sutapa, Rounak Islam
article en

Abstract

Brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) requires considerable soil moisture throughout its life cycle, therefore, its cultivation in water constraint area is difficult. Though different soil moisture conservation technologies and lower water use irrigation systems have been developed for crop cultivation, their successful deployment largely depends on the locality, especially on soil characteristics. This study evaluated the effects of irrigation regimes, mulching practices, and their combination on growth, stress physiology and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) of brinjal across two field locations with contrasting soil conditions. Location 1 had coarser soil, lower nutrient and organic matter content profiles and lower water-holding capacity than location 2. The experiment comprised three irrigation levels [rainfed (I0), conventional furrow irrigation (IC), and drip irrigation (ID)] and three mulching treatments [no mulch (M0), straw mulch (MS), and plastic mulch (MP)] with three replications at both locations. Irrigation and mulching both significantly influenced growth, stress indicators, fruit yield, and IWUE, though the effects of the treatment on these parameters varied between locations. At Location 1, drip irrigation (ID) produced a fruit yield of 8.90 ± 5.68 t ha-1, with considerable variability among replicates, and did not differ significantly (p = 0.88) from conventional furrow irrigation (IC) or the rainfed treatment (I0). In contrast, at location 2, drip irrigation outperformed (21.88 ± 9.44 t ha-1) other treatments, being 117% and 32% higher than I0 and IC, respectively. Plastic mulching (MP) improved growth, reduced drought stress and increased yield compared to MS and M0 at both locations. The highest yield at location 1 (23.18 ± 6.62 t ha-1) occurred under IC × MP, while the highest yield at location 2 (32.93 ± 1.62 t ha-1) was achieved under ID × MP. IWUE peaked at 38.84 kg ha-1 mm-1 (IC × MP) in location 1 and 65.87 kg ha-1 mm-1 (ID × MP) in location 2. A linear mixed model estimated that plastic mulch increased yield by ~10.63 t ha-1 (95% CI: 6.58-14.68 t ha-1, p < 0.001) over no mulch, and IC × MP produced a synergistic yield gain of 11.03 t ha-1 (95% CI: 5.3-16.76 t ha-1, p = 0.003) over the control. Overall, plastic mulching consistently enhanced brinjal performance, while the benefit of drip irrigation was soil-dependent and was most evident in the higher water-retention field.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Bangladesh Agricultural University (BD), Adelaide University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon