Robotic navigation and precision in lung nodule microwave ablation

Aim: Robotic-assisted puncture systems have been developed, but evidence for their use in percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of lung nodules remains limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 183 patients who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous MWA for pulmonary nodules < 3 cm between March 2024 and April 2025. Patients underwent robotic-assisted or conventional freehand puncture. After 1:1 propensity score matching, technical success, puncture deviation, intraprocedural CT acquisitions, needle adjustments, and complications were compared. Multivariable logistic regression, subgroup analyses, and learning-curve analysis were performed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (ES-2026-K212-02) on 23 June 2026. The requirement for individual written informed consent for study participation was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study; patients were covered under the hospital's general informed consent for hospitalization. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the procedure. Results: After matching, 86 patients were included (43 per group), with comparable baseline characteristics and 100% technical success in both groups. Compared with freehand puncture, robotic-assisted navigation was associated with significantly reduced puncture deviation (median [IQR], 3.0 [2.0-4.5] vs. 6.0 [5.0-9.5] mm), intraprocedural CT scans (2.0 [1.5-2.0] vs. 5.0 [5.0-7.0]), and needle adjustments (2.0 [1.5-2.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.0]; all P < 0.01). Robotic-assisted navigation was associated with a lower overall complication rate (46.51% vs. 81.40%; P < 0.01), driven mainly by reduced pneumothorax (27.91% vs. 69.77%; P < 0.01) and chest drain insertion rates (4.65% vs. 20.93%; P = 0.02). Multivariable analysis robotic-assisted puncture remained independently associated with a lower risk of pneumothorax (OR 0.160, 95%CI: 0.061-0.420, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits across strata. Procedural performance stabilized after approximately 24 robotic-assisted cases. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted navigation was associated with greater procedural precision, efficiency, and safety in CT-guided percutaneous MWA, while demonstrating consistent performance across different lesion characteristics and a relatively short learning curve. It may serve as a reproducible and standardized platform for percutaneous pulmonary ablation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Artificial Intelligence Surgery
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20517/ais.2026.88
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic navigation and precision in lung nodule microwave ablation

Hengrui Liang, 刘航辉, Qiu Li, Fei Cui et al.
5 links
Artificial Intelligence Surgery
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Robotic navigation and precision in lung nodule microwave ablation

Hengrui Liang, 刘航辉, Qiu Li, Fei Cui, Xingyang Xue, Lisheng Huang, Jun Liu, Xuekun Zhang, Lilong Li, Yunlong Qu
article en

Abstract

Aim: Robotic-assisted puncture systems have been developed, but evidence for their use in percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) of lung nodules remains limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 183 patients who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous MWA for pulmonary nodules < 3 cm between March 2024 and April 2025. Patients underwent robotic-assisted or conventional freehand puncture. After 1:1 propensity score matching, technical success, puncture deviation, intraprocedural CT acquisitions, needle adjustments, and complications were compared. Multivariable logistic regression, subgroup analyses, and learning-curve analysis were performed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (ES-2026-K212-02) on 23 June 2026. The requirement for individual written informed consent for study participation was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study; patients were covered under the hospital's general informed consent for hospitalization. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the procedure. Results: After matching, 86 patients were included (43 per group), with comparable baseline characteristics and 100% technical success in both groups. Compared with freehand puncture, robotic-assisted navigation was associated with significantly reduced puncture deviation (median [IQR], 3.0 [2.0-4.5] vs. 6.0 [5.0-9.5] mm), intraprocedural CT scans (2.0 [1.5-2.0] vs. 5.0 [5.0-7.0]), and needle adjustments (2.0 [1.5-2.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-4.0]; all P < 0.01). Robotic-assisted navigation was associated with a lower overall complication rate (46.51% vs. 81.40%; P < 0.01), driven mainly by reduced pneumothorax (27.91% vs. 69.77%; P < 0.01) and chest drain insertion rates (4.65% vs. 20.93%; P = 0.02). Multivariable analysis robotic-assisted puncture remained independently associated with a lower risk of pneumothorax (OR 0.160, 95%CI: 0.061-0.420, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed consistent benefits across strata. Procedural performance stabilized after approximately 24 robotic-assisted cases. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted navigation was associated with greater procedural precision, efficiency, and safety in CT-guided percutaneous MWA, while demonstrating consistent performance across different lesion characteristics and a relatively short learning curve. It may serve as a reproducible and standardized platform for percutaneous pulmonary ablation.

Artificial Intelligence SurgeryVol. 6(4)
First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon