Advancing neurosurgical practice with augmented reality: a single-center real-world case series with illustrated technical notes

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world application and clinical value of a head-mounted augmented reality (AR) navigation platform across a wide range of neurosurgical pathologies and procedures. METHODS In this real-world retrospective case series, the authors assessed 105 neurosurgical procedures performed by 8 neurosurgeons at a single center from January 2024 to March 2026. A head-mounted AR navigation platform (SurgicalAR, Cranial Navigation, and Spine Navigation; Medivis) was used in all procedures. Video records were available for all cases. Clinical and pathological data, surgical approaches, types of reference frames, and registration methods were systematically collected. The workflow for each surgical approach was characterized in detail. RESULTS This analysis included 105 cases (60 female, mean age 53.5). Cranial surgeries (n = 92, 87.6%) were most common, predominantly for tumors (n = 69, 65.7%), with meningioma (22.9%) and glioblastoma (19.0%) as the leading pathologies. Custom reference frames (n = 57) and surface registration (n = 93) were the most frequently used techniques in cranial navigation. In cranial tumor surgery, gross-total resection was achieved in 62 of 69 cases, supported by multimodal AR planning. In spine surgery, all 34 pedicle screws placed with the Spine Navigation system achieved a Gertzbein-Robbins grade of A. AR was also successfully applied to cerebrovascular, puncture-based, and functional surgery. CONCLUSIONS Head-mounted AR navigation was feasible across diverse procedures, but its value depended on case selection, registration reliability, and workflow. It was most useful for multimodal tumor planning, pedicle screw placement, and percutaneous interventions; conventional navigation or direct anatomical guidance remained necessary when AR accuracy or ergonomics were inadequate. These findings support AR as a significant advancement in future neurosurgical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurosurgical FOCUS
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3171/2026.8.focus26408
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing neurosurgical practice with augmented reality: a single-center real-world case series with illustrated technical notes

Zhang Peihai, YANG Xue⁃jun, Jiahe Guo, Xiaolei Zhang et al.
2 links
Neurosurgical FOCUS
Augmented Reality Applications
article

Advancing neurosurgical practice with augmented reality: a single-center real-world case series with illustrated technical notes

Zhang Peihai, YANG Xue⁃jun, Jiahe Guo, Xiaolei Zhang, Kai Zhang, Haowei Li, Guo Yi, Xisen Wang, Xuya Wang, Youtu Wu, Zhiyan Kou, Tuoyu Chen, Guangzhi Wang, Kai Zhao, Wei Shi, Zhenxing Sun, Mingyue Zhang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-world application and clinical value of a head-mounted augmented reality (AR) navigation platform across a wide range of neurosurgical pathologies and procedures. METHODS In this real-world retrospective case series, the authors assessed 105 neurosurgical procedures performed by 8 neurosurgeons at a single center from January 2024 to March 2026. A head-mounted AR navigation platform (SurgicalAR, Cranial Navigation, and Spine Navigation; Medivis) was used in all procedures. Video records were available for all cases. Clinical and pathological data, surgical approaches, types of reference frames, and registration methods were systematically collected. The workflow for each surgical approach was characterized in detail. RESULTS This analysis included 105 cases (60 female, mean age 53.5). Cranial surgeries (n = 92, 87.6%) were most common, predominantly for tumors (n = 69, 65.7%), with meningioma (22.9%) and glioblastoma (19.0%) as the leading pathologies. Custom reference frames (n = 57) and surface registration (n = 93) were the most frequently used techniques in cranial navigation. In cranial tumor surgery, gross-total resection was achieved in 62 of 69 cases, supported by multimodal AR planning. In spine surgery, all 34 pedicle screws placed with the Spine Navigation system achieved a Gertzbein-Robbins grade of A. AR was also successfully applied to cerebrovascular, puncture-based, and functional surgery. CONCLUSIONS Head-mounted AR navigation was feasible across diverse procedures, but its value depended on case selection, registration reliability, and workflow. It was most useful for multimodal tumor planning, pedicle screw placement, and percutaneous interventions; conventional navigation or direct anatomical guidance remained necessary when AR accuracy or ergonomics were inadequate. These findings support AR as a significant advancement in future neurosurgical practice.

Neurosurgical FOCUSVol. 61(5)
Peking University International Hospital (CN), Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon