Infant Sleep Consolidation Assessed by Maternal Perception and Actigraphy

AIM: This study aims to (1) compare three different subjective and objective measures in assessing the proportion of infants sleeping through the night and (2) identify which sleep variables contribute to maternal appraisal of sleeping through the night. METHODS: Fifty-six mothers of 6-months-old infants completed the Sleep Practices Questionnaire (SPQ), assessing at what age their infant started to sleep through the night. Infants were dichotomized as sleeping through the night or not at 6 months. Total nocturnal sleep duration, longest consecutive sleep duration, and total duration of nocturnal awakenings were measured with sleep diaries and actigraphy (12 nights). The proportion of infants sleeping through the night was assessed using the SPQ, sleep diaries and actigraphy. Forward binary logistic regression was used to determine which diary or actigraphy variables contributed to maternal appraisal. RESULTS: Less than half of infants were sleeping through the night when using the SPQ (44.2%) and sleep diaries (39.5%), while this proportion increased to 90.7% with actigraphy. Sleep-diary consecutive sleep duration was the only variable contributing to maternal appraisals of sleeping through the night. CONCLUSION: While the type of measurements yielded different proportions, sleep-diary derived longest consecutive sleep duration was highly associated with maternal appraisal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Paediatrica
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.70812
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infant Sleep Consolidation Assessed by Maternal Perception and Actigraphy

Christine Laganière, Marie‐Julie Béliveau, Marjolaine Chicoine, Marie‐Hélène Pennestri et al.
Acta Paediatrica
Sleep and related disorders
article

Infant Sleep Consolidation Assessed by Maternal Perception and Actigraphy

Christine Laganière, Marie‐Julie Béliveau, Marjolaine Chicoine, Marie‐Hélène Pennestri, Karine Dubois‐Comtois, AP vandenBerg, Rebecca Burdayron, Malka Hershon, Michelle Ly
article en

Abstract

AIM: This study aims to (1) compare three different subjective and objective measures in assessing the proportion of infants sleeping through the night and (2) identify which sleep variables contribute to maternal appraisal of sleeping through the night. METHODS: Fifty-six mothers of 6-months-old infants completed the Sleep Practices Questionnaire (SPQ), assessing at what age their infant started to sleep through the night. Infants were dichotomized as sleeping through the night or not at 6 months. Total nocturnal sleep duration, longest consecutive sleep duration, and total duration of nocturnal awakenings were measured with sleep diaries and actigraphy (12 nights). The proportion of infants sleeping through the night was assessed using the SPQ, sleep diaries and actigraphy. Forward binary logistic regression was used to determine which diary or actigraphy variables contributed to maternal appraisal. RESULTS: Less than half of infants were sleeping through the night when using the SPQ (44.2%) and sleep diaries (39.5%), while this proportion increased to 90.7% with actigraphy. Sleep-diary consecutive sleep duration was the only variable contributing to maternal appraisals of sleeping through the night. CONCLUSION: While the type of measurements yielded different proportions, sleep-diary derived longest consecutive sleep duration was highly associated with maternal appraisal.

Acta Paediatrica
Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies (CA), Santé Québec (CA), McGill University (CA), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Canada Research Chairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon