Using SpliceAI to triage splice-altering variants in 7,220 individuals with rare conditions highlights limitations of the precomputed scores

Abstract Background SpliceAI is a deep learning algorithm that predicts whether genetic variants are likely to affect splicing. Precomputed SpliceAI predictions for all theoretical SNVs and small indels were released in 2019, and are used by variant annotation tools such as VEP and dbNSFP to batch annotate large numbers of variants quickly. While the use of precomputed scores vastly reduces the computational cost of retrieving SpliceAI predictions, several limitations to their utility have emerged, for which the impact on the prioritisation of likely splice-altering variants in cohort studies has not been established. Methods We identify transcript annotation and genome version inconsistencies impacting the precomputed SpliceAI scores by comparing the original gene annotation file with MANE v1.0 Select transcripts. To quantify the impact that these factors may have in variant prioritisation pipelines for diagnostic purposes, we re-analysed variants in 660 genes linked to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), identified in 7,221 participants with NDD from the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project (100kGP). Results We find outdated gene annotations and genome version inconsistencies impact 8.34% of theoretical SNVs included in the SpliceAI precomputed scores, and affect the accuracy of SpliceAI predictions in 34.98% of disease-associated panelApp green genes. In 7,221 Genomics England participants, re-running SpliceAI with updated annotations and parameters results in an increase of 18.2% predicted splice-altering variants compared with variants identified using precomputed scores alone. These variants constitute a diagnostic increase of 11.7% versus the precomputed scores, assessed retrospectively using confirmed diagnoses in 100kGP. To mitigate issues with the precomputed scores we provide ‘SpliceAI-splint’- a command-line tool to allow users to identify variants within a VCF file whose potential splice-altering effects would be missed by the precomputed scores. Conclusions: Although the precomputed scores continue to represent a useful resource in the annotation of variants in cohorts with genetic disorders, we find key limitations that can lead to their missing clinically relevant splice-altering variants, and provide a command-line tool to mitigate these issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genome Medicine
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-026-01797-6
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using SpliceAI to triage splice-altering variants in 7,220 individuals with rare conditions highlights limitations of the precomputed scores

Ruebena Dawes, Susan Walker, François Lecoquierre, Nicola Whiffin et al.
1 links
Genome Medicine
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Using SpliceAI to triage splice-altering variants in 7,220 individuals with rare conditions highlights limitations of the precomputed scores

Ruebena Dawes, Susan Walker, François Lecoquierre, Nicola Whiffin, Alexandra C Martin-Geary
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background SpliceAI is a deep learning algorithm that predicts whether genetic variants are likely to affect splicing. Precomputed SpliceAI predictions for all theoretical SNVs and small indels were released in 2019, and are used by variant annotation tools such as VEP and dbNSFP to batch annotate large numbers of variants quickly. While the use of precomputed scores vastly reduces the computational cost of retrieving SpliceAI predictions, several limitations to their utility have emerged, for which the impact on the prioritisation of likely splice-altering variants in cohort studies has not been established. Methods We identify transcript annotation and genome version inconsistencies impacting the precomputed SpliceAI scores by comparing the original gene annotation file with MANE v1.0 Select transcripts. To quantify the impact that these factors may have in variant prioritisation pipelines for diagnostic purposes, we re-analysed variants in 660 genes linked to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD), identified in 7,221 participants with NDD from the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project (100kGP). Results We find outdated gene annotations and genome version inconsistencies impact 8.34% of theoretical SNVs included in the SpliceAI precomputed scores, and affect the accuracy of SpliceAI predictions in 34.98% of disease-associated panelApp green genes. In 7,221 Genomics England participants, re-running SpliceAI with updated annotations and parameters results in an increase of 18.2% predicted splice-altering variants compared with variants identified using precomputed scores alone. These variants constitute a diagnostic increase of 11.7% versus the precomputed scores, assessed retrospectively using confirmed diagnoses in 100kGP. To mitigate issues with the precomputed scores we provide ‘SpliceAI-splint’- a command-line tool to allow users to identify variants within a VCF file whose potential splice-altering effects would be missed by the precomputed scores. Conclusions: Although the precomputed scores continue to represent a useful resource in the annotation of variants in cohorts with genetic disorders, we find key limitations that can lead to their missing clinically relevant splice-altering variants, and provide a command-line tool to mitigate these issues.

Genome Medicine
Broad Institute (US), Centre for Human Genetics (GB), Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU), Inserm (FR), UNSW Sydney (AU), University of Oxford (GB), Genomics England (GB), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen (FR), Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB), Université de Rouen Normandie (FR), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon