Does the reading brain possess top-down connections from morphemes to letters?

No psycholinguist will contradict the importance of morphemes in language processing. But as a cognitive construct, the morpheme and its operations are not fully mapped out yet. Here, we investigated whether morphemes provide top-down support for their constituent letters: a so-called morpheme superiority effect. In two experiments (N = 100 per experiment), French participants identified single letters in nonword strings that either comprised a French affix (e.g., 'o' in 'cojuste') or not ('o' in 'sojuste'). In Experiment 1 participants provided free-recall responses by typing letters seen at postcued locations. Experiment 2 was a Reicher-Wheeler (i.e., two-alternative forced-choice) version of the same task. Neither experiment evidenced better identification of target letters embedded in affixes than nonaffixes. On the other hand, we did observe an impact of the frequencies of embedding N-grams (i.e., letter chunks). Hence, while the brain learns and represents letter combinations, we did not observe evidence for morpheme representations partaking in the brain's feedback loop. Findings are discussed in light of the recent PONG model of word recognition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-026-03037-9
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does the reading brain possess top-down connections from morphemes to letters?

Jonathan Grainger B, Elisabeth Beyersmann, Joshua Snell, Maša Mlinarič
2 links
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Does the reading brain possess top-down connections from morphemes to letters?

Jonathan Grainger B, Elisabeth Beyersmann, Joshua Snell, Maša Mlinarič
article en

Abstract

No psycholinguist will contradict the importance of morphemes in language processing. But as a cognitive construct, the morpheme and its operations are not fully mapped out yet. Here, we investigated whether morphemes provide top-down support for their constituent letters: a so-called morpheme superiority effect. In two experiments (N = 100 per experiment), French participants identified single letters in nonword strings that either comprised a French affix (e.g., 'o' in 'cojuste') or not ('o' in 'sojuste'). In Experiment 1 participants provided free-recall responses by typing letters seen at postcued locations. Experiment 2 was a Reicher-Wheeler (i.e., two-alternative forced-choice) version of the same task. Neither experiment evidenced better identification of target letters embedded in affixes than nonaffixes. On the other hand, we did observe an impact of the frequencies of embedding N-grams (i.e., letter chunks). Hence, while the brain learns and represents letter combinations, we did not observe evidence for morpheme representations partaking in the brain's feedback loop. Findings are discussed in light of the recent PONG model of word recognition.

Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewVol. 33(8)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Macquarie University (AU)
European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon