Stochastic Optimisation—When a Poor Pseudo-Random Number Generator Is Better

In global optimisation, the conventional approach is to use a stochastic algorithm based on a pseudo-random number generator (PRNG). Such a generator, together with its seed, produces a sequence of numbers that is sufficiently long for no cycle to be encountered during a typical run. However, when objective-function evaluations are costly, other approaches may be preferable. The list-based one not only uses much shorter sequences, which are repeated cyclically, but can also sometimes achieve equivalent or even better results with a smaller evaluation budget. As a proof of concept, we consider GA-MPC, the winner of the CEC 2011 competition, and define LB-GA-MPC, a deterministic, list-based version of this algorithm. We apply it to a few problems from the competition benchmark. For every problem considered, there is at least one list length for which LB-GA-MPC outperforms GA-MPC, in some cases by a substantial margin.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2581.v1
Primary Topic
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Stochastic Optimisation—When a Poor Pseudo-Random Number Generator Is Better

Maurice Clerc
Preprints.org
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
preprint

Stochastic Optimisation—When a Poor Pseudo-Random Number Generator Is Better

Maurice Clerc
preprint en

Abstract

In global optimisation, the conventional approach is to use a stochastic algorithm based on a pseudo-random number generator (PRNG). Such a generator, together with its seed, produces a sequence of numbers that is sufficiently long for no cycle to be encountered during a typical run. However, when objective-function evaluations are costly, other approaches may be preferable. The list-based one not only uses much shorter sequences, which are repeated cyclically, but can also sometimes achieve equivalent or even better results with a smaller evaluation budget. As a proof of concept, we consider GA-MPC, the winner of the CEC 2011 competition, and define LB-GA-MPC, a deterministic, list-based version of this algorithm. We apply it to a few problems from the competition benchmark. For every problem considered, there is at least one list length for which LB-GA-MPC outperforms GA-MPC, in some cases by a substantial margin.

Preprints.org
Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon