Feasibility assessment of novel binocular eye alignment monitor device for intermittent exotropia

Intermittent exotropia exhibits inherent variability in the percentage of time the eye deviates and the amount of exodeviation; therefore, assessing the magnitude and duration of the eye’s deviation is challenging. A portable monitoring device for longer assessments can enhance evaluation and management, providing an objective tool for assessing therapeutic rehabilitative interventions. The Binocular Eye Alignment Monitor (BEAM) was developed to objectively evaluate eye alignment over an extended period. Eye position was objectively recorded from 22 participants with binocularly normal vision and 15 with intermittent exotropia. Participants watched an age-appropriate movie of their choice on a television located 6 m away for 90 min after undergoing a strabismus evaluation in two sessions, each occurring on a different day. Test and retest sessions were analyzed for the percentage of test time deviated, as well as the maximum, mean, and median deviation magnitudes. Repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. The BEAM has a temporal resolution of 8 milliseconds and a conservative spatial resolution of 2Δ. A Mann-Whitney U-test revealed significant differences between groups for the percentage of time deviated and the maximum, mean, and median deviation ( p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots indicated good repeatability and narrow limits of agreement in the binocular normal vision group, whereas the intermittent exotropia group showed greater variability. Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the maximum deviation measured by a clinician and the BEAM ( p < 0.03). These feasibility results warrant further evaluation of the BEAM for future randomized clinical trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-76743-y
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility assessment of novel binocular eye alignment monitor device for intermittent exotropia

Christopher J. Morris, Erin C. Jenewein, Tara L. Alvarez, Mitchell Scheiman
3 links
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
article

Feasibility assessment of novel binocular eye alignment monitor device for intermittent exotropia

Christopher J. Morris, Erin C. Jenewein, Tara L. Alvarez, Mitchell Scheiman
article en

Abstract

Intermittent exotropia exhibits inherent variability in the percentage of time the eye deviates and the amount of exodeviation; therefore, assessing the magnitude and duration of the eye’s deviation is challenging. A portable monitoring device for longer assessments can enhance evaluation and management, providing an objective tool for assessing therapeutic rehabilitative interventions. The Binocular Eye Alignment Monitor (BEAM) was developed to objectively evaluate eye alignment over an extended period. Eye position was objectively recorded from 22 participants with binocularly normal vision and 15 with intermittent exotropia. Participants watched an age-appropriate movie of their choice on a television located 6 m away for 90 min after undergoing a strabismus evaluation in two sessions, each occurring on a different day. Test and retest sessions were analyzed for the percentage of test time deviated, as well as the maximum, mean, and median deviation magnitudes. Repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots. The BEAM has a temporal resolution of 8 milliseconds and a conservative spatial resolution of 2Δ. A Mann-Whitney U-test revealed significant differences between groups for the percentage of time deviated and the maximum, mean, and median deviation ( p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots indicated good repeatability and narrow limits of agreement in the binocular normal vision group, whereas the intermittent exotropia group showed greater variability. Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the maximum deviation measured by a clinician and the BEAM ( p < 0.03). These feasibility results warrant further evaluation of the BEAM for future randomized clinical trials.

Scientific Reports
Drexel University Elkins Park Campus (US), New Jersey Institute of Technology (US), Drexel University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon