Innovative humanitarian finance: examining the promises and realities of impact bonds in humanitarian and refugee response

This article contributes to scholarship on innovative humanitarian finance by examining the application of impact bonds-an outcome-based financing mechanism where investors fund projects upfront and are repaid with interest if they succeed. Amid consistent funding shortfalls, impact bonds were framed as a radical transformation in how aid can be financed and delivered. By sharing financial risk with investors and linking payment to results, they were meant to attract private capital and enhance aid effectiveness. However, this study reveals a gap between the expectations and realities of impact bonds through case studies of two pilots: the Humanitarian Impact Bond (International Committee of the Red Cross); and the Refugee Impact Bond (Near East Foundation). In practice, impact bonds did not generate additional funds for the humanitarian sector, transfer significant risk to investors, or outperform traditionally financed programmes. The article therefore underscores the need for a rigorous evaluation of new financing mechanisms before adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disasters
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.70074
Primary Topic
Community Development and Social Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Innovative humanitarian finance: examining the promises and realities of impact bonds in humanitarian and refugee response

Laila Zulkaphil
1 links
Disasters
Community Development and Social Impact
article

Innovative humanitarian finance: examining the promises and realities of impact bonds in humanitarian and refugee response

Laila Zulkaphil
article en

Abstract

This article contributes to scholarship on innovative humanitarian finance by examining the application of impact bonds-an outcome-based financing mechanism where investors fund projects upfront and are repaid with interest if they succeed. Amid consistent funding shortfalls, impact bonds were framed as a radical transformation in how aid can be financed and delivered. By sharing financial risk with investors and linking payment to results, they were meant to attract private capital and enhance aid effectiveness. However, this study reveals a gap between the expectations and realities of impact bonds through case studies of two pilots: the Humanitarian Impact Bond (International Committee of the Red Cross); and the Refugee Impact Bond (Near East Foundation). In practice, impact bonds did not generate additional funds for the humanitarian sector, transfer significant risk to investors, or outperform traditionally financed programmes. The article therefore underscores the need for a rigorous evaluation of new financing mechanisms before adoption.

DisastersVol. 51(1)
University of Manchester (GB), Humanitarian Institute (RU)
University of Manchester, Economic and Social Research Council
Partnerships for the goals, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Community Development and Social Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon