Co‐Governance of Nature‐based Solutions for Just Urban Food Futures: From Global Evidence to Local Practice

Urban food-growing initiatives, ranging from community gardens to networks of backyards, have gained attention within urban food policy as nature-based solutions (NbS) capable of delivering food security, social, and environmental benefits. Yet as the 2030 horizon for global sustainability and urban food governance agendas approaches, concerns persist that existing governance arrangements remain ill-equipped to address deep-seated power inequalities, food insecurity, and social injustice. This article examines how justice and resilience materialise through co-governance in food-growing NbS. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyse 390 NbS projects from the Urban Nature Atlas NATURESCAPES dataset to identify patterns across food-growing NbS and combine these findings with qualitative insights from two emblematic cases: the backyard garden network Patios Productivos in Cartagena (Colombia), and the Horta Nova Horticultural Park in Lisbon (Portugal). These cases embody the predominant bottom-up and multi-actor governance dynamics identified across food-growing NbS. Drawing on the five A’s co-governance framework—Authority, Agency, Arrangement, Alignment, and Accomplishment—we examine how power, recognition, and justice are negotiated over time. Our findings reveal that food-growing NbS overwhelmingly emerge as community-led responses to socio-economic vulnerability and exhibit distinctive governance patterns shaped by context-specific collaborations, long-term partnerships, and the balance between community autonomy and institutional recognition. We argue that community-led food NbS function as transformative social infrastructures, and that justice and resilience are co-produced through contested governance arrangements. By foregrounding power and co-governance, this article contributes to debates on urban food politics and helps advance a just post-2030 urban food governance agenda.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Politics and Governance
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.12669
Primary Topic
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co‐Governance of Nature‐based Solutions for Just Urban Food Futures: From Global Evidence to Local Practice

Andresa Lêdo Marques, Philipp Montenegro, Sara Maia
1 links
Politics and Governance
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
article

Co‐Governance of Nature‐based Solutions for Just Urban Food Futures: From Global Evidence to Local Practice

Andresa Lêdo Marques, Philipp Montenegro, Sara Maia
article en

Abstract

Urban food-growing initiatives, ranging from community gardens to networks of backyards, have gained attention within urban food policy as nature-based solutions (NbS) capable of delivering food security, social, and environmental benefits. Yet as the 2030 horizon for global sustainability and urban food governance agendas approaches, concerns persist that existing governance arrangements remain ill-equipped to address deep-seated power inequalities, food insecurity, and social injustice. This article examines how justice and resilience materialise through co-governance in food-growing NbS. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyse 390 NbS projects from the Urban Nature Atlas NATURESCAPES dataset to identify patterns across food-growing NbS and combine these findings with qualitative insights from two emblematic cases: the backyard garden network Patios Productivos in Cartagena (Colombia), and the Horta Nova Horticultural Park in Lisbon (Portugal). These cases embody the predominant bottom-up and multi-actor governance dynamics identified across food-growing NbS. Drawing on the five A’s co-governance framework—Authority, Agency, Arrangement, Alignment, and Accomplishment—we examine how power, recognition, and justice are negotiated over time. Our findings reveal that food-growing NbS overwhelmingly emerge as community-led responses to socio-economic vulnerability and exhibit distinctive governance patterns shaped by context-specific collaborations, long-term partnerships, and the balance between community autonomy and institutional recognition. We argue that community-led food NbS function as transformative social infrastructures, and that justice and resilience are co-produced through contested governance arrangements. By foregrounding power and co-governance, this article contributes to debates on urban food politics and helps advance a just post-2030 urban food governance agenda.

Politics and GovernanceVol. 15
University of Lisbon (PT), Lund University (SE), Central European University (AT), Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa (PT)
European Commission, Lunds Universitet
Sustainable cities and communities, Zero hunger, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon