Why do hemolysis interference studies produce different results? A proposal for standardized experimental design and reporting

BACKGROUND: Hemolysis is a major preanalytical source of laboratory interference, but methods used to experimentally generate hemolyzed specimens are poorly standardized. CONTENT: Different lysis procedures, blood sources, cellular compositions, hemolysate volumes, control designs, and time-to-analysis can influence results independently of free hemoglobin concentration. The amount and composition of intracellular material released may also vary with erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet characteristics. Therefore, identical hemolysis indices do not necessarily represent equivalent experimental interferents. SUMMARY: Hemolysis interference studies should clearly distinguish the interferent, its method of generation, and its measurement. Detailed reporting of specimen preparation and experimental conditions is essential for reproducibility and comparison between studies. OUTLOOK: Harmonized hemolysate preparation and reporting, together with assessment at clinically relevant measurand concentrations and, when appropriate, multiple time points, would improve the reliability of hemolysis thresholds and laboratory decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2026-1381
Primary Topic
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why do hemolysis interference studies produce different results? A proposal for standardized experimental design and reporting

Nathan Lorde, Oswald Sonntag, Mario Plebani, Hikmet Can Çubukçu et al.
2 links
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
article

Why do hemolysis interference studies produce different results? A proposal for standardized experimental design and reporting

Nathan Lorde, Oswald Sonntag, Mario Plebani, Hikmet Can Çubukçu, Charles R. Lefèvre, Giuseppe Lippi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemolysis is a major preanalytical source of laboratory interference, but methods used to experimentally generate hemolyzed specimens are poorly standardized. CONTENT: Different lysis procedures, blood sources, cellular compositions, hemolysate volumes, control designs, and time-to-analysis can influence results independently of free hemoglobin concentration. The amount and composition of intracellular material released may also vary with erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet characteristics. Therefore, identical hemolysis indices do not necessarily represent equivalent experimental interferents. SUMMARY: Hemolysis interference studies should clearly distinguish the interferent, its method of generation, and its measurement. Detailed reporting of specimen preparation and experimental conditions is essential for reproducibility and comparison between studies. OUTLOOK: Harmonized hemolysate preparation and reporting, together with assessment at clinically relevant measurand concentrations and, when appropriate, multiple time points, would improve the reliability of hemolysis thresholds and laboratory decision-making.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
University of Verona (IT), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Padua (IT), Inserm (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Azienda Ospedale - Università Padova (IT), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR), Nutrition, métabolismes et cancer (FR), Sincan Training and Research Hospital (TR), Université de Rennes (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon