groundTruther: A statistical approach to accounting for uncertainty in side-scan sonar classification

Abstract Objective Side-scan sonar is a valuable tool for mapping benthic habitat, allowing habitat patches (e.g., substrate and large woody debris) within the sonar swath to be mapped and classified with near-complete coverage over large spatial extents. However, like all remote sensing classifications, classifications derived from sonar imagery have inherent uncertainty. Ground-truthing can help quantify classification accuracy, but positional errors introduce additional uncertainty and may reduce confidence in the estimated classification accuracy. We propose an approach to account for positional errors when estimating classification accuracy and propagate uncertainty in patch classification. We provide a worked example of the process and its application to a Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens habitat suitability index (HSI). Methods We begin by accounting for the magnitude of positional error associated with ground-truthing geographic coordinates, considering two options: (1) subset to retain ground-truthing data with a high degree of confidence that they are within corresponding patches or (2) propagate uncertainty in ground-truthing locations as point clouds of possible locations. Multinomial models are then fit to the subset data or location realizations to estimate the accuracy of sonar classifications. Next, the estimated classification accuracies are used to reclassify patch types multiple times, propagating uncertainty in the composition of patch types. Last, the sets of reclassified patches are used to calculate multiple realizations of the HSI to estimate the median and probable area of suitable habitat within the study extent and areas of interest. Results Because substrates that are difficult to distinguish in sonar imagery (e.g., sand vs. gravel) had similar suitability scores, uncertainty in the overall HSI scores tended to be lower than uncertainty in the substrate classifications. Nevertheless, incorporating classification uncertainty into the calculation of the HSI allowed uncertainties to be maintained in end products used for decision making. Conclusions To provide a reproducible workflow for propagating classification uncertainties in side-scan sonar imagery and other remote sensing data, our approach is formalized as a set of functions available as an R package, groundTruther. This package provides end users with functions to develop habitat maps while accounting for uncertainty to better inform management decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/najfmt/vqag101
Primary Topic
Underwater Acoustics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

groundTruther: A statistical approach to accounting for uncertainty in side-scan sonar classification

Matthew R. Acre, Sophia M. Bonjour, Jason L. Fischer, Robert D. Hunter et al.
1 links
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Underwater Acoustics Research
article

groundTruther: A statistical approach to accounting for uncertainty in side-scan sonar classification

Matthew R. Acre, Sophia M. Bonjour, Jason L. Fischer, Robert D. Hunter, Jesse McCarter
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Side-scan sonar is a valuable tool for mapping benthic habitat, allowing habitat patches (e.g., substrate and large woody debris) within the sonar swath to be mapped and classified with near-complete coverage over large spatial extents. However, like all remote sensing classifications, classifications derived from sonar imagery have inherent uncertainty. Ground-truthing can help quantify classification accuracy, but positional errors introduce additional uncertainty and may reduce confidence in the estimated classification accuracy. We propose an approach to account for positional errors when estimating classification accuracy and propagate uncertainty in patch classification. We provide a worked example of the process and its application to a Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens habitat suitability index (HSI). Methods We begin by accounting for the magnitude of positional error associated with ground-truthing geographic coordinates, considering two options: (1) subset to retain ground-truthing data with a high degree of confidence that they are within corresponding patches or (2) propagate uncertainty in ground-truthing locations as point clouds of possible locations. Multinomial models are then fit to the subset data or location realizations to estimate the accuracy of sonar classifications. Next, the estimated classification accuracies are used to reclassify patch types multiple times, propagating uncertainty in the composition of patch types. Last, the sets of reclassified patches are used to calculate multiple realizations of the HSI to estimate the median and probable area of suitable habitat within the study extent and areas of interest. Results Because substrates that are difficult to distinguish in sonar imagery (e.g., sand vs. gravel) had similar suitability scores, uncertainty in the overall HSI scores tended to be lower than uncertainty in the substrate classifications. Nevertheless, incorporating classification uncertainty into the calculation of the HSI allowed uncertainties to be maintained in end products used for decision making. Conclusions To provide a reproducible workflow for propagating classification uncertainties in side-scan sonar imagery and other remote sensing data, our approach is formalized as a set of functions available as an R package, groundTruther. This package provides end users with functions to develop habitat maps while accounting for uncertainty to better inform management decisions.

North American Journal of Fisheries Management
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Great Lakes Science Center (US), Columbia Environmental Research Center (US), University of Toledo (US)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Underwater Acoustics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon