A latent profile analysis of father support breastfeeding self-efficacy in the early postpartum period: a cross-sectional study

Background Paternal support is a key determinant of breastfeeding success, with paternal breastfeeding support self-efficacy serving as the core cognitive foundation for fathers’ involvement in assisting their partners. However, existing research has focused on group-average levels, overlooking heterogeneity. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroups of paternal breastfeeding support self-efficacy in the early postpartum period and to examine factors associated with profile membership. Methods During September 2024 to February 2025, fathers of newborns were recruited by convenience sampling from a tertiary obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Shanghai. Measures included a general information questionnaire, a breastfeeding knowledge questionnaire, and the Father Support Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (FBSES-SF). Latent profile models were estimated in Mplus 8.3, and factors associated with profile membership were examined using multivariable multinomial logistic regression via the three-step (R3STEP) procedure, which accounts for latent-class classification error. Results The 306 fathers (mean age 31.69 ± 3.93 years) had a mean FBSES-SF total score of (53.03 ± 10.00). Three profiles emerged: low self-efficacy group (18.6%, n = 57), moderate self-efficacy group (64.7%, n = 198), and high self-efficacy group (16.7%, n = 51), which were largely parallel and best interpreted as severity gradations. Lower breastfeeding knowledge (OR = 0.90 per point, 95% CI 0.82–0.99) and perceiving breastfeeding as not important (OR = 9.44, 95% CI 1.65–53.91) were associated with membership in the low rather than the moderate group; perceiving breastfeeding as generally rather than very important (OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.08–0.42) and expecting non-exclusive feeding (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.16–0.89) were associated with lower odds of membership in the high group. Associations were unchanged after adjustment for paternal age, education, and household income. Conclusion Paternal breastfeeding support self-efficacy comprises three profiles that may guide early identification of fathers needing additional support. These findings may inform the development of stratified support strategies; whether such strategies improve paternal support behaviors or breastfeeding outcomes remains a hypothesis to be tested in future longitudinal and interventional studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1951173
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A latent profile analysis of father support breastfeeding self-efficacy in the early postpartum period: a cross-sectional study

Nafei Guo, Lan Zhang, Ying Liu, Nuannuan Pan et al.
3 links
Frontiers in Nutrition
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

A latent profile analysis of father support breastfeeding self-efficacy in the early postpartum period: a cross-sectional study

Nafei Guo, Lan Zhang, Ying Liu, Nuannuan Pan, Junying Li, Qing Wang
article en

Abstract

Background Paternal support is a key determinant of breastfeeding success, with paternal breastfeeding support self-efficacy serving as the core cognitive foundation for fathers’ involvement in assisting their partners. However, existing research has focused on group-average levels, overlooking heterogeneity. This study used latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroups of paternal breastfeeding support self-efficacy in the early postpartum period and to examine factors associated with profile membership. Methods During September 2024 to February 2025, fathers of newborns were recruited by convenience sampling from a tertiary obstetrics and gynecology hospital in Shanghai. Measures included a general information questionnaire, a breastfeeding knowledge questionnaire, and the Father Support Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (FBSES-SF). Latent profile models were estimated in Mplus 8.3, and factors associated with profile membership were examined using multivariable multinomial logistic regression via the three-step (R3STEP) procedure, which accounts for latent-class classification error. Results The 306 fathers (mean age 31.69 ± 3.93 years) had a mean FBSES-SF total score of (53.03 ± 10.00). Three profiles emerged: low self-efficacy group (18.6%, n = 57), moderate self-efficacy group (64.7%, n = 198), and high self-efficacy group (16.7%, n = 51), which were largely parallel and best interpreted as severity gradations. Lower breastfeeding knowledge (OR = 0.90 per point, 95% CI 0.82–0.99) and perceiving breastfeeding as not important (OR = 9.44, 95% CI 1.65–53.91) were associated with membership in the low rather than the moderate group; perceiving breastfeeding as generally rather than very important (OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.08–0.42) and expecting non-exclusive feeding (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.16–0.89) were associated with lower odds of membership in the high group. Associations were unchanged after adjustment for paternal age, education, and household income. Conclusion Paternal breastfeeding support self-efficacy comprises three profiles that may guide early identification of fathers needing additional support. These findings may inform the development of stratified support strategies; whether such strategies improve paternal support behaviors or breastfeeding outcomes remains a hypothesis to be tested in future longitudinal and interventional studies.

Frontiers in NutritionVol. 13
Tongji University (CN), Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon