Who Are Our Peers? Using k-Prototypes Clustering to Construct Institutional Peer Groups

This article presents a reproducible public-data methodology for constructing institutional peer groups in higher education. Using Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) data, we develop a two-stage k-prototypes clustering workflow that accommodates both numerical and categorical institutional features. The first stage identifies a broad institutional comparison set across all IPEDS institutions, while the second stage reclusters institutions within the focal institution’s global cluster to identify a more focused local peer group. Using St. Bonaventure University as a case example, the procedure identified a global comparison cluster of 1,132 institutions and a local peer cluster of 247 institutions. We further use a random forest classifier and shallow decision-tree surrogate to summarize the institutional characteristics that distinguish the resulting local clusters. The framework provides a transparent and adaptable approach for institutional peer-group construction using publicly available data and open-source analytical tools.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/phnaw_v1
Primary Topic
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Who Are Our Peers? Using k-Prototypes Clustering to Construct Institutional Peer Groups

Scott Simpson
1 links
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
preprint

Who Are Our Peers? Using k-Prototypes Clustering to Construct Institutional Peer Groups

Scott Simpson
preprint en

Abstract

This article presents a reproducible public-data methodology for constructing institutional peer groups in higher education. Using Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) data, we develop a two-stage k-prototypes clustering workflow that accommodates both numerical and categorical institutional features. The first stage identifies a broad institutional comparison set across all IPEDS institutions, while the second stage reclusters institutions within the focal institution’s global cluster to identify a more focused local peer group. Using St. Bonaventure University as a case example, the procedure identified a global comparison cluster of 1,132 institutions and a local peer cluster of 247 institutions. We further use a random forest classifier and shallow decision-tree surrogate to summarize the institutional characteristics that distinguish the resulting local clusters. The framework provides a transparent and adaptable approach for institutional peer-group construction using publicly available data and open-source analytical tools.

Quality education
Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Who Are Our Peers? Using k-Prototypes Clustering to Construct Institutional Peer Groups — Scott Simpson · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS