Disparities in Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Rural Versus Urban Michigan

INTRODUCTION: Rurality is one of many disparities leading to lower cancer screening rates, as well as higher cancer incidence and mortality. Our study was designed to evaluate rural-urban disparities in incidence and cancer-specific mortality for the leading cancers in the State of Michigan from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021. METHODS: Data was obtained for the 10 leading cancers in both incidence and cancer-specific mortality from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Service. Rural-urban comparisons were made for incidence, incidence by SEER stage, and cancer-specific mortality and reported as rate ratios. RESULTS: Combining the 10 leading cancers in Michigan during our study period, the age-adjusted incidence rate was significantly lower (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96, p < 0.001), whereas the age-adjusted cancer-specific mortality rate was significantly higher (MRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p = 0.023) in our rural study population. Regarding cancers with proven screening benefits, age-adjusted incidence rates and cancer-specific mortality rates for female breast (IRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.85-0.89; p < 0.001 and MRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.81-0.98; p = 0.012) and prostate (IRR 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.88; p < 0.001 and MRR 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98; p = 0.012) cancer were significantly lower in rural Michigan. Lung and bronchus cancer had significantly higher age-adjusted incidence rates and cancer-specific mortality rates in our rural study population (IRR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.10; p < 0.001 and MRR 1.17; 95% CI 1.14-1.20; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our rural Michigan population had significantly lower incidence rates for the 10 leading cancers in incidence, female breast cancer, and prostate cancer in our study period. However, rurality was associated with higher age-adjusted cancer-specific mortality for the 10 leading cancers regarding mortality and for lung and bronchus cancer. Continued focus on Michigan's existing public health programs may further bridge rural disparity gaps.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Medicine
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.72396
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Rural Versus Urban Michigan

Olanipekun Lanny Ntukidem, Sichao Wang, Austin H. Qasawa, Stephanie Mackenzie et al.
Cancer Medicine
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Disparities in Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Rural Versus Urban Michigan

Olanipekun Lanny Ntukidem, Sichao Wang, Austin H. Qasawa, Stephanie Mackenzie, Richard A. Shellenberger, Carolyn Anne Carrera, James P Purtell, Sunaina Gowda, Reba Dhillon
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rurality is one of many disparities leading to lower cancer screening rates, as well as higher cancer incidence and mortality. Our study was designed to evaluate rural-urban disparities in incidence and cancer-specific mortality for the leading cancers in the State of Michigan from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2021. METHODS: Data was obtained for the 10 leading cancers in both incidence and cancer-specific mortality from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Service. Rural-urban comparisons were made for incidence, incidence by SEER stage, and cancer-specific mortality and reported as rate ratios. RESULTS: Combining the 10 leading cancers in Michigan during our study period, the age-adjusted incidence rate was significantly lower (IRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96, p < 0.001), whereas the age-adjusted cancer-specific mortality rate was significantly higher (MRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07, p = 0.023) in our rural study population. Regarding cancers with proven screening benefits, age-adjusted incidence rates and cancer-specific mortality rates for female breast (IRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.85-0.89; p < 0.001 and MRR 0.87; 95% CI 0.81-0.98; p = 0.012) and prostate (IRR 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.88; p < 0.001 and MRR 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98; p = 0.012) cancer were significantly lower in rural Michigan. Lung and bronchus cancer had significantly higher age-adjusted incidence rates and cancer-specific mortality rates in our rural study population (IRR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.10; p < 0.001 and MRR 1.17; 95% CI 1.14-1.20; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our rural Michigan population had significantly lower incidence rates for the 10 leading cancers in incidence, female breast cancer, and prostate cancer in our study period. However, rurality was associated with higher age-adjusted cancer-specific mortality for the 10 leading cancers regarding mortality and for lung and bronchus cancer. Continued focus on Michigan's existing public health programs may further bridge rural disparity gaps.

Cancer MedicineVol. 15(11)
Trinity Health (US), Ann Arbor Center for Independent Living (US), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon