Awatar i głos osoby zmarłej oraz opis z modelu językowego w muzeum. Obowiązki przejrzystości z art. 50 AI Act a ochrona pamięci zmarłych

The article establishes who must disclose AI-generated content in a museum, when exceptions apply and whether labelling suffices for lawful use of a deceased person’s image and voice. Methods: Interpretation of the AI Act and Polish law, review of deployments. Results: A museum using an avatar or an AI-generated description is a deployer of an AI system and from 2 August 2026 must label content under Article 50(4). For artistic content, only the form of disclosure changes. A description generated by a language model needs no label if a human genuinely reviewed it and editorial responsibility was assumed. Discussion and conclusions: Other provisions govern the lawful use of the image and voice. As a rule, disseminating an image requires permission for 20 years after death. Later, relatives’ consent is a precaution, not a statutory requirement, regarding the right to the memory of the deceased (kult pamięci).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Muzealnictwo
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69500/m.147
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Awatar i głos osoby zmarłej oraz opis z modelu językowego w muzeum. Obowiązki przejrzystości z art. 50 AI Act a ochrona pamięci zmarłych

P. Kowalski
1 links
Muzealnictwo
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Awatar i głos osoby zmarłej oraz opis z modelu językowego w muzeum. Obowiązki przejrzystości z art. 50 AI Act a ochrona pamięci zmarłych

P. Kowalski
article en

Abstract

The article establishes who must disclose AI-generated content in a museum, when exceptions apply and whether labelling suffices for lawful use of a deceased person’s image and voice. Methods: Interpretation of the AI Act and Polish law, review of deployments. Results: A museum using an avatar or an AI-generated description is a deployer of an AI system and from 2 August 2026 must label content under Article 50(4). For artistic content, only the form of disclosure changes. A description generated by a language model needs no label if a human genuinely reviewed it and editorial responsibility was assumed. Discussion and conclusions: Other provisions govern the lawful use of the image and voice. As a rule, disseminating an image requires permission for 20 years after death. Later, relatives’ consent is a precaution, not a statutory requirement, regarding the right to the memory of the deceased (kult pamięci).

Muzealnictwo(67)
Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon