The Gap Between Subjective Sleep Complaints and Objective Obstructive Sleep Apnea Burden Among Professional Drivers

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly relevant among professional drivers; however, self-reported symptoms may not reflect the objective disease burden. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between subjective sleep complaints and the objectively measured OSA burden in 207 professional metropolitan public transport drivers undergoing respiratory polygraphy. Daytime sleepiness, insomnia symptoms, sleep quality, and OSA risk were assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and STOP–BANG questionnaire. The objective OSA burden was assessed using the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) and the sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden (SASHB). Moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/h) was identified in 65.2% of participants, whereas excessive daytime sleepiness was reported by only 2.4%. The ESS, AIS, and PSQI scores were correlated with one another but not with the AHI or SASHB. A model combining these subjective measures showed limited discrimination for moderate-to-severe OSA (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.533), whereas a model including age and body mass index (BMI) showed modest discrimination (AUC = 0.637), with BMI independently associated with the outcome. Subjective sleep complaints were poorly associated with the objectively measured OSA burden, supporting the use of clinical risk assessment and objective sleep evaluation when indicated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clocks & Sleep
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep8040070
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Gap Between Subjective Sleep Complaints and Objective Obstructive Sleep Apnea Burden Among Professional Drivers

Stefan Dumitrache‐Rujinski, Claudia Mariana Handra, Gabriela Roxana Louisse Neacșu, Agripina Rașcu et al.
Clocks & Sleep
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

The Gap Between Subjective Sleep Complaints and Objective Obstructive Sleep Apnea Burden Among Professional Drivers

Stefan Dumitrache‐Rujinski, Claudia Mariana Handra, Gabriela Roxana Louisse Neacșu, Agripina Rașcu, Alexandra Beatrice Nedelcu, Anne Mary Denisse Neacşu
article en

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly relevant among professional drivers; however, self-reported symptoms may not reflect the objective disease burden. This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between subjective sleep complaints and the objectively measured OSA burden in 207 professional metropolitan public transport drivers undergoing respiratory polygraphy. Daytime sleepiness, insomnia symptoms, sleep quality, and OSA risk were assessed using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and STOP–BANG questionnaire. The objective OSA burden was assessed using the apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) and the sleep apnea-specific hypoxic burden (SASHB). Moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/h) was identified in 65.2% of participants, whereas excessive daytime sleepiness was reported by only 2.4%. The ESS, AIS, and PSQI scores were correlated with one another but not with the AHI or SASHB. A model combining these subjective measures showed limited discrimination for moderate-to-severe OSA (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.533), whereas a model including age and body mass index (BMI) showed modest discrimination (AUC = 0.637), with BMI independently associated with the outcome. Subjective sleep complaints were poorly associated with the objectively measured OSA burden, supporting the use of clinical risk assessment and objective sleep evaluation when indicated.

Clocks & SleepVol. 8(4)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Affidea (CH), Institutul de Pneumoftiziologie "Marius Nasta" (RO), Spitalul Clinic Colentina (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon