Model selection in linear mixed-effects analysis of craving outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of medications for opioid use disorders

Identifying an appropriate covariance structure is a critical step in modeling longitudinal changes in polysubstance cravings during medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) treatment. This study analyzed data from the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network trial CTN0051, in which participants with opioid use disorders (OUDs) were randomized to receive either buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX; n = 287) or extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX; n = 283). Cravings for opioids, alcohol, stimulants, and nicotine were assessed at baseline and every four weeks over 36 weeks. Repeated-measures linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to examine longitudinal craving trajectories, with treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction specified as fixed effects and within-participant correlations among repeated observations modeled through the residual (R-side) covariance structure. Ten commonly used covariance structures were compared using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) to determine optimal model fit. AIC-based comparisons indicated that the unstructured (UN) covariance structure provided the best fit for alcohol, opioid, and stimulant cravings and the second-best fit for nicotine craving. Using the UN covariance structure, craving scores decreased significantly from baseline across all four craving domains during follow-up. Treatment-by-visit interactions were observed for stimulant craving at selected visits, indicating differences between treatment groups in changes from baseline over time. Baseline alcohol and amphetamine use disorders predicted higher alcohol cravings, while baseline depression, amphetamine, and cocaine use disorders predicted greater stimulant cravings; baseline cocaine use disorder also predicted elevated nicotine craving. In conclusion, the UN covariance structure most effectively captured craving trajectories. These findings identify clinical characteristics associated with differences in reported craving; however, their utility for guiding treatment selection or predicting relapse requires prospective validation. Clinical trial number : NCT02032433.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-77858-y
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Model selection in linear mixed-effects analysis of craving outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of medications for opioid use disorders

Pamela J. Wright, Donna M. Kazemi, Phyllis Raynor, Kesheng Wang et al.
Scientific Reports
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Model selection in linear mixed-effects analysis of craving outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of medications for opioid use disorders

Pamela J. Wright, Donna M. Kazemi, Phyllis Raynor, Kesheng Wang, Jiajia Zhang
article en

Abstract

Identifying an appropriate covariance structure is a critical step in modeling longitudinal changes in polysubstance cravings during medications for opioid use disorders (MOUD) treatment. This study analyzed data from the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network trial CTN0051, in which participants with opioid use disorders (OUDs) were randomized to receive either buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX; n = 287) or extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX; n = 283). Cravings for opioids, alcohol, stimulants, and nicotine were assessed at baseline and every four weeks over 36 weeks. Repeated-measures linear mixed models (LMMs) were used to examine longitudinal craving trajectories, with treatment, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction specified as fixed effects and within-participant correlations among repeated observations modeled through the residual (R-side) covariance structure. Ten commonly used covariance structures were compared using Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) to determine optimal model fit. AIC-based comparisons indicated that the unstructured (UN) covariance structure provided the best fit for alcohol, opioid, and stimulant cravings and the second-best fit for nicotine craving. Using the UN covariance structure, craving scores decreased significantly from baseline across all four craving domains during follow-up. Treatment-by-visit interactions were observed for stimulant craving at selected visits, indicating differences between treatment groups in changes from baseline over time. Baseline alcohol and amphetamine use disorders predicted higher alcohol cravings, while baseline depression, amphetamine, and cocaine use disorders predicted greater stimulant cravings; baseline cocaine use disorder also predicted elevated nicotine craving. In conclusion, the UN covariance structure most effectively captured craving trajectories. These findings identify clinical characteristics associated with differences in reported craving; however, their utility for guiding treatment selection or predicting relapse requires prospective validation. Clinical trial number : NCT02032433.

Scientific Reports
University of South Carolina (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon