Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Herbal Versus Pharmaceutical Antidepressants in Adults with Depression: A Scoping Review

Background: Depression is a major cause of disability worldwide. Pharmaceutical antidepressants are standard treatments for moderate to severe depression; however, adverse effects, tolerability concerns, and incomplete treatment responses have increased interest in herbal alternatives. Evidence directly comparing herbal and pharmaceutical antidepressants remains inconsistent. Objective: To examine and synthesise evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of herbal versus pharmaceutical antidepressants in adults with depression. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, CENTRAL, and grey literature sources. Eligible studies were primary comparative clinical studies involving adults aged 18 years and older with depressive disorders or clinically significant depressive symptoms. Data were synthesised according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Twenty-one comparative studies met the inclusion criteria. Hypericum perforatum (St John’s wort) was the most frequently investigated herbal intervention, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants were the main pharmaceutical comparators. Standardised Hypericum perforatum preparations demonstrated efficacy comparable to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in mild to moderate depression. Pharmaceutical antidepressants, however, showed more consistent benefits in moderate to severe depression. Herbal interventions were generally associated with fewer adverse effects and lower treatment discontinuation rates. Conclusion: Herbal antidepressants, particularly standardised Hypericum perforatum preparations, may offer an effective and better-tolerated treatment option for some adults with mild to moderate depression. However, variations in study design, intervention standardisation, and reporting limit definitive conclusions. Further high-quality comparative research is required to strengthen the evidence base and guide clinical decision-making and support evidence-based treatment recommendations. What this study adds: This review highlights the severity-dependent efficacy and tolerability of pharmaceutical and natural antidepressants. Standardized Hypericum perforatum is identified as a potentially useful and better-tolerated treatment for mild-to-moderate depression, but it also highlights safety issues, especially herb–drug interactions, and important data gaps that need to be studied.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2569.v1
Primary Topic
Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Herbal Versus Pharmaceutical Antidepressants in Adults with Depression: A Scoping Review

Shamanie Govender, Kuben Naidoo, Makuété A. P. Tiawoun, Karishma Singh
1 links
Preprints.org
Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies
preprint

Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Herbal Versus Pharmaceutical Antidepressants in Adults with Depression: A Scoping Review

Shamanie Govender, Kuben Naidoo, Makuété A. P. Tiawoun, Karishma Singh
preprint en

Abstract

Background: Depression is a major cause of disability worldwide. Pharmaceutical antidepressants are standard treatments for moderate to severe depression; however, adverse effects, tolerability concerns, and incomplete treatment responses have increased interest in herbal alternatives. Evidence directly comparing herbal and pharmaceutical antidepressants remains inconsistent. Objective: To examine and synthesise evidence on the comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of herbal versus pharmaceutical antidepressants in adults with depression. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, CENTRAL, and grey literature sources. Eligible studies were primary comparative clinical studies involving adults aged 18 years and older with depressive disorders or clinically significant depressive symptoms. Data were synthesised according to Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: Twenty-one comparative studies met the inclusion criteria. Hypericum perforatum (St John’s wort) was the most frequently investigated herbal intervention, while selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants were the main pharmaceutical comparators. Standardised Hypericum perforatum preparations demonstrated efficacy comparable to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in mild to moderate depression. Pharmaceutical antidepressants, however, showed more consistent benefits in moderate to severe depression. Herbal interventions were generally associated with fewer adverse effects and lower treatment discontinuation rates. Conclusion: Herbal antidepressants, particularly standardised Hypericum perforatum preparations, may offer an effective and better-tolerated treatment option for some adults with mild to moderate depression. However, variations in study design, intervention standardisation, and reporting limit definitive conclusions. Further high-quality comparative research is required to strengthen the evidence base and guide clinical decision-making and support evidence-based treatment recommendations. What this study adds: This review highlights the severity-dependent efficacy and tolerability of pharmaceutical and natural antidepressants. Standardized Hypericum perforatum is identified as a potentially useful and better-tolerated treatment for mild-to-moderate depression, but it also highlights safety issues, especially herb–drug interactions, and important data gaps that need to be studied.

Preprints.org
Good health and well-being
Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon