In Their Own Words: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of What Students, Staff, and Faculty Say About Vertical Transfer

This research analyzed higher education constituencies’ statements about vertical transfer (student transfer from community to bachelor’s colleges). Data consisted of both focus group excerpts involving dozens of students, staff, and faculty, and of answers to open-ended survey questions completed by thousands of students and faculty. Results were generally consistent using both qualitative (topic identification) and quantitative (bigram frequency and sentiment analysis) analyses. The results were also compared according to participant type (students, staff, and faculty) and higher education sector (community and bachelor’s colleges). The extensive results included that all constituencies expressed a need for more information about transfer. In addition, students frequently described the vertical transfer experience negatively. Further, community college constituencies’ statements were consistent with their relative lack of power concerning vertical transfer, while the opposite was the case for bachelor’s college constituencies. The results also included many specific suggestions regarding how to improve transfer processes, such as by improving the timing of the steps involved in transfer. Listening to what people involved in vertical transfer have to say about it, including how to improve it, can provide higher education with information that can help facilitate vertical transfer and increase equitable access to higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Postsecondary Student Success
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33009/fsop_jpss141343
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Their Own Words: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of What Students, Staff, and Faculty Say About Vertical Transfer

Alexandra W. Logue, David M. Wutchiett, Stephanie Abbeyquaye, Barbara Condliffe et al.
2 links
Journal of Postsecondary Student Success
Higher Education Research Studies
article

In Their Own Words: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses of What Students, Staff, and Faculty Say About Vertical Transfer

Alexandra W. Logue, David M. Wutchiett, Stephanie Abbeyquaye, Barbara Condliffe, Rhina Torres, Kerstin Gentsch, Nayeon Yoo, Kyle Du, Sophia Sutcliffe, Yoshiko Oka, Vita Rabinowitz
article en

Abstract

This research analyzed higher education constituencies’ statements about vertical transfer (student transfer from community to bachelor’s colleges). Data consisted of both focus group excerpts involving dozens of students, staff, and faculty, and of answers to open-ended survey questions completed by thousands of students and faculty. Results were generally consistent using both qualitative (topic identification) and quantitative (bigram frequency and sentiment analysis) analyses. The results were also compared according to participant type (students, staff, and faculty) and higher education sector (community and bachelor’s colleges). The extensive results included that all constituencies expressed a need for more information about transfer. In addition, students frequently described the vertical transfer experience negatively. Further, community college constituencies’ statements were consistent with their relative lack of power concerning vertical transfer, while the opposite was the case for bachelor’s college constituencies. The results also included many specific suggestions regarding how to improve transfer processes, such as by improving the timing of the steps involved in transfer. Listening to what people involved in vertical transfer have to say about it, including how to improve it, can provide higher education with information that can help facilitate vertical transfer and increase equitable access to higher education.

Journal of Postsecondary Student SuccessVol. 6(1)
The Graduate Center, CUNY (US), Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (US), City University of New York (US), Hunter College (US)
Quality education, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon