Five Possible Centers for a Cube Move of a 10-Realization

Melotti, Ramassamy and Thevenin proposed that a cube move of an alpha-realization, for alpha>1, has at most three possible central points. We give a counterexample at alpha=10: two construction curves with a common focus have at least five distinct intersection points. All foci and boundary vertices of the cube configuration are rational. The proof reduces the intersection equations to a continuous scalar function and certifies five sign changes using rational enclosures of fifth roots. A reflection construction supplies a rational input center and verifies the noncollinearity conditions. The same boundary has at least five output centers for exponents in an open neighborhood of 10. This refutes the three-center bound in Melotti's contribution to Oberwolfach Report 35/2020, p1785, and Remark4.8 of Cube moves for s-embeddings and alpha-realizations (2023), exactly frozen UnsolvedMath record OWR-2654831-006. We do not assert that five is the maximum or that the configuration is a proper embedding; crossed edges are allowed by the source definition. This four-page English preprint includes a standard-library exact arithmetic checker with 67 checks. Developed with AI assistance and self-audited, it is unrefereed, without independent review, proof-assistant verification or absolute-priority certification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23692374
Primary Topic
Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Five Possible Centers for a Cube Move of a 10-Realization

Alper Ferudun
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
preprint

Five Possible Centers for a Cube Move of a 10-Realization

Alper Ferudun
preprint en

Abstract

Melotti, Ramassamy and Thevenin proposed that a cube move of an alpha-realization, for alpha>1, has at most three possible central points. We give a counterexample at alpha=10: two construction curves with a common focus have at least five distinct intersection points. All foci and boundary vertices of the cube configuration are rational. The proof reduces the intersection equations to a continuous scalar function and certifies five sign changes using rational enclosures of fifth roots. A reflection construction supplies a rational input center and verifies the noncollinearity conditions. The same boundary has at least five output centers for exponents in an open neighborhood of 10. This refutes the three-center bound in Melotti's contribution to Oberwolfach Report 35/2020, p1785, and Remark4.8 of Cube moves for s-embeddings and alpha-realizations (2023), exactly frozen UnsolvedMath record OWR-2654831-006. We do not assert that five is the maximum or that the configuration is a proper embedding; crossed edges are allowed by the source definition. This four-page English preprint includes a standard-library exact arithmetic checker with 67 checks. Developed with AI assistance and self-audited, it is unrefereed, without independent review, proof-assistant verification or absolute-priority certification.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Five Possible Centers for a Cube Move of a 10-Realization — Alper Ferudun · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS