Open Science in Canada: Mapping Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions, and Implementation

Open science is a national priority in Canada, yet the transition from policy to practice depends on understanding the researchers whose behaviour these policies seek to change. We report a nationwide survey that comprehensively assesses the state of open science across Canadian higher education. Researchers and trainees recruited through 18 institutions (N = 705) rated 13 open science practices across five dimensions: awareness, knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and implementation. Roughly one in three respondents had never heard of open science before the survey. Among those who had, attitudes were consistently positive and there was a widespread desire to learn more, but self-assessed knowledge was low and concentrated in two long-established practices — open access and open-source software — and implementation exceeded 20% for only four of the 13 practices. Researchers pointed to a lack of training and know-how, rather than a lack of interest, as the primary barriers. Two further patterns compounded these gaps: respondents underestimated how favourably their peers viewed open science while overestimating how much their peers practised it, and their stated intentions for the coming year ran well ahead of historically observed rates of adoption. Together, these findings describe a research community that is willing but underequipped and largely unaware of its own consensus, indicating that the main barriers to open science in Canada lie in capacity and perception rather than attitudes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34808550
Primary Topic
Academic Publishing and Open Access
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Open Science in Canada: Mapping Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions, and Implementation

Krista Byers‐Heinlein, Nicolás Alessandroni
Figshare
Academic Publishing and Open Access
preprint

Open Science in Canada: Mapping Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions, and Implementation

Krista Byers‐Heinlein, Nicolás Alessandroni
preprint en

Abstract

Open science is a national priority in Canada, yet the transition from policy to practice depends on understanding the researchers whose behaviour these policies seek to change. We report a nationwide survey that comprehensively assesses the state of open science across Canadian higher education. Researchers and trainees recruited through 18 institutions (N = 705) rated 13 open science practices across five dimensions: awareness, knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and implementation. Roughly one in three respondents had never heard of open science before the survey. Among those who had, attitudes were consistently positive and there was a widespread desire to learn more, but self-assessed knowledge was low and concentrated in two long-established practices — open access and open-source software — and implementation exceeded 20% for only four of the 13 practices. Researchers pointed to a lack of training and know-how, rather than a lack of interest, as the primary barriers. Two further patterns compounded these gaps: respondents underestimated how favourably their peers viewed open science while overestimating how much their peers practised it, and their stated intentions for the coming year ran well ahead of historically observed rates of adoption. Together, these findings describe a research community that is willing but underequipped and largely unaware of its own consensus, indicating that the main barriers to open science in Canada lie in capacity and perception rather than attitudes.

Figshare
Quality education
Academic Publishing and Open Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon