South Australian psychiatrists’ view of voluntary assisted dying: A qualitative content analysis

ObjectiveTo explore the views of South Australian psychiatrists regarding rational suicide, their views and experiences of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) and their reported willingness in discussing end-of-life issues with patients and expressing their views regarding VAD with their colleagues.MethodAn online qualitative survey was designed, piloted and sent via email to all members of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) in South Australia and responses were subject to qualitative content analysis.ResultsA range of views were identified, from agreement with the concept of rational suicide and support for VAD citing respect for autonomy and dignity, through to misunderstanding of the psychiatrist's role, ambivalence and a rejection of VAD, grounded in discomfort in assisting death. Not all those in support of the legislation were willing to be involved in the VAD process and some only wanted very limited involvement.ConclusionsThis study highlights that psychiatrists do not have equal understanding of South Australian VAD legislation. We recommend that a learning module for psychiatrists be designed and delivered by the RANZCP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562261498143
Primary Topic
Palliative and Oncologic Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

South Australian psychiatrists’ view of voluntary assisted dying: A qualitative content analysis

Anna Chur‐Hansen, Adele Jackson
Australasian Psychiatry
Palliative and Oncologic Care
article

South Australian psychiatrists’ view of voluntary assisted dying: A qualitative content analysis

Anna Chur‐Hansen, Adele Jackson
article en

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the views of South Australian psychiatrists regarding rational suicide, their views and experiences of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) and their reported willingness in discussing end-of-life issues with patients and expressing their views regarding VAD with their colleagues.MethodAn online qualitative survey was designed, piloted and sent via email to all members of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) in South Australia and responses were subject to qualitative content analysis.ResultsA range of views were identified, from agreement with the concept of rational suicide and support for VAD citing respect for autonomy and dignity, through to misunderstanding of the psychiatrist's role, ambivalence and a rejection of VAD, grounded in discomfort in assisting death. Not all those in support of the legislation were willing to be involved in the VAD process and some only wanted very limited involvement.ConclusionsThis study highlights that psychiatrists do not have equal understanding of South Australian VAD legislation. We recommend that a learning module for psychiatrists be designed and delivered by the RANZCP.

Australasian Psychiatry
Adelaide University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Palliative and Oncologic Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
South Australian psychiatrists’ view of voluntary assisted dying: A qualitative content analysis — Anna Chur‐Hansen, Adele Jackson · Australasian Psychiatry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS