Whose Carbon Is It Anyway? Exploring Household Dynamics in Sustainable Mobility Tracking

Transport behaviors are a major contributor to carbon emissions, and decisions are often made at the household level around what form of transport to take and when. Technology, primarily eco-feedback interfaces (EFIs) have been suggested to support users in making environmentally friendly choices. However, there is a lack in understanding of how the underlying social dynamics of households influence decisions around sustainable practices, particularly through the lens of mobility. To understand how to design technology to better support households in negotiating around sustainable mobility choices, the research team interviewed 21 participants across nine households, probing them with four low-fidelity mockups representative of EFIs from prior work. We found that the varied mobility-related responsibilities among household members, as well as varying perspectives on the environment, can cause friction in the utility of EFIs in the home. We suggest that designs can account for these factors through acknowledging varied roles and perspectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3858359
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose Carbon Is It Anyway? Exploring Household Dynamics in Sustainable Mobility Tracking

Matthew Dressa, Daniel A. Epstein, Maryam Hassani
1 links
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Whose Carbon Is It Anyway? Exploring Household Dynamics in Sustainable Mobility Tracking

Matthew Dressa, Daniel A. Epstein, Maryam Hassani
article en

Abstract

Transport behaviors are a major contributor to carbon emissions, and decisions are often made at the household level around what form of transport to take and when. Technology, primarily eco-feedback interfaces (EFIs) have been suggested to support users in making environmentally friendly choices. However, there is a lack in understanding of how the underlying social dynamics of households influence decisions around sustainable practices, particularly through the lens of mobility. To understand how to design technology to better support households in negotiating around sustainable mobility choices, the research team interviewed 21 participants across nine households, probing them with four low-fidelity mockups representative of EFIs from prior work. We found that the varied mobility-related responsibilities among household members, as well as varying perspectives on the environment, can cause friction in the utility of EFIs in the home. We suggest that designs can account for these factors through acknowledging varied roles and perspectives.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 11(2)
University of California, Irvine (US)
National Science Foundation
Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Whose Carbon Is It Anyway? Exploring Household Dynamics in Sustainable Mobility Tracking — Matthew Dressa, Daniel A. Epstein, et al. · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS