Basiliximab induction in Asian kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based therapy: a SIPTW-adjusted retrospective cohort study

The role of basiliximab induction in Asian kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression remains unclear, particularly among low-risk patients. This single-center retrospective study evaluated 1-year transplant outcomes and infection risk in adult Asian recipients undergoing their first kidney transplantation. We analyzed patients aged over 20 years who underwent kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2021. Patients were categorized into basiliximab induction and no-induction groups; patients at increased immunological risk were recommended to receive self-funded basiliximab induction. The primary outcome was one-year acute rejection; secondary outcomes included one-year graft survival, infection and graft function. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics, and Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to compare outcomes between the basiliximab and no-induction groups. Among 216 screened recipients, 163 met the inclusion criteria, and 79 (48%) received basiliximab. Within the first year after transplantation, acute rejection occurred in 7 of 79 patients (8.9%) in the basiliximab group and 4 of 84 patients (4.8%) in the no-induction group, with no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of acute rejection at one year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–4.75). One-year graft survival was comparable between groups (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96–1.16). One-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 50.1 ± 24.0 mL/min/1.73 m² in the basiliximab group and 47.9 ± 30.7 mL/min/1.73 m² in the no-induction group, with no statistically significant difference. There was no significant difference in infection risk between the two groups (aHR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.57–3.48). In this single-center retrospective study of Asian kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression, basiliximab induction showed no significant difference in the short-term outcomes of one-year acute rejection, graft survival, and graft function compared with no induction. A selective, risk-adapted approach, rather than routine induction, may therefore be more appropriate in this setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nephrology
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-026-05453-4
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Basiliximab induction in Asian kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based therapy: a SIPTW-adjusted retrospective cohort study

Ling‐Yi Wang, Wei‐Chuan Chang, Chong-Jhen Fu
2 links
BMC Nephrology
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
article

Basiliximab induction in Asian kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus-based therapy: a SIPTW-adjusted retrospective cohort study

Ling‐Yi Wang, Wei‐Chuan Chang, Chong-Jhen Fu
article en

Abstract

The role of basiliximab induction in Asian kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression remains unclear, particularly among low-risk patients. This single-center retrospective study evaluated 1-year transplant outcomes and infection risk in adult Asian recipients undergoing their first kidney transplantation. We analyzed patients aged over 20 years who underwent kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2021. Patients were categorized into basiliximab induction and no-induction groups; patients at increased immunological risk were recommended to receive self-funded basiliximab induction. The primary outcome was one-year acute rejection; secondary outcomes included one-year graft survival, infection and graft function. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (SIPTW) was used to balance baseline characteristics, and Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed to compare outcomes between the basiliximab and no-induction groups. Among 216 screened recipients, 163 met the inclusion criteria, and 79 (48%) received basiliximab. Within the first year after transplantation, acute rejection occurred in 7 of 79 patients (8.9%) in the basiliximab group and 4 of 84 patients (4.8%) in the no-induction group, with no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of acute rejection at one year (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–4.75). One-year graft survival was comparable between groups (aHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.96–1.16). One-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 50.1 ± 24.0 mL/min/1.73 m² in the basiliximab group and 47.9 ± 30.7 mL/min/1.73 m² in the no-induction group, with no statistically significant difference. There was no significant difference in infection risk between the two groups (aHR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.57–3.48). In this single-center retrospective study of Asian kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression, basiliximab induction showed no significant difference in the short-term outcomes of one-year acute rejection, graft survival, and graft function compared with no induction. A selective, risk-adapted approach, rather than routine induction, may therefore be more appropriate in this setting.

BMC Nephrology
Tzu Chi University (TW), Tzu Chi Foundation (TW), Chia-Yi Christian Hospital (TW), Hualien Tzu Chi Medical Center (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon