Boundary Trouble: Struggles for Aesthetic Sphere Autonomy in Norway

This article discusses major culture controversies occurring in Norway over the last decades as instances of boundary blurring between the aesthetic and non-aesthetic spheres, focusing on aesthetic sphere actors’ struggles for autonomy. Drawing on influential sociological theories, it examines how the spheres of state, market, civil, intimate relations, and religion are perceived as threatening aesthetic sphere autonomy, both by aesthetic sphere and non-aesthetic sphere actors. The analysis identifies key figures who are able to transform aesthetic sphere discussions, practices, and decisions into public sphere controversies, and it explores the repair activities used to restore legitimate relations between social spheres. Finally, it assesses whether the aesthetic sphere’s legitimate relations with other spheres are characterized as autonomous or semi-autonomous, and how current relations are evaluated by actors both inside and outside the sphere of aesthetics. The article demonstrates that contemporary struggles for aesthetic sphere autonomy are complex and involve numerous actors, and that the legitimacy of inter-sphere relations is context dependent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cultural Sociology
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755261492358
Primary Topic
Social and Cultural Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Boundary Trouble: Struggles for Aesthetic Sphere Autonomy in Norway

Håkon Larsen
Cultural Sociology
Social and Cultural Dynamics
article

Boundary Trouble: Struggles for Aesthetic Sphere Autonomy in Norway

Håkon Larsen
article en

Abstract

This article discusses major culture controversies occurring in Norway over the last decades as instances of boundary blurring between the aesthetic and non-aesthetic spheres, focusing on aesthetic sphere actors’ struggles for autonomy. Drawing on influential sociological theories, it examines how the spheres of state, market, civil, intimate relations, and religion are perceived as threatening aesthetic sphere autonomy, both by aesthetic sphere and non-aesthetic sphere actors. The analysis identifies key figures who are able to transform aesthetic sphere discussions, practices, and decisions into public sphere controversies, and it explores the repair activities used to restore legitimate relations between social spheres. Finally, it assesses whether the aesthetic sphere’s legitimate relations with other spheres are characterized as autonomous or semi-autonomous, and how current relations are evaluated by actors both inside and outside the sphere of aesthetics. The article demonstrates that contemporary struggles for aesthetic sphere autonomy are complex and involve numerous actors, and that the legitimacy of inter-sphere relations is context dependent.

Cultural Sociology
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social and Cultural Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon