Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Regenerative Medicine

Regeneration of the dental, oral, and craniofacial (DOC) complex is challenging because mineralized, soft, vascular, and neural tissues lie side by side, and defects are often large and irregular. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting enables fabrication of patient-specific, cell-laden constructs and may offer new regenerative options for complex oral cases. This narrative review summarizes current bioprinting technologies, their applications across DOC tissues, and the barriers to clinical adoption. Inkjet, laser-assisted, light-based, extrusion, and co-axial platforms differ in speed, resolution, cell viability, and cost, while intraoperative bioprinting allows constructs to be printed directly into the defect during surgery. Hydrogel-based bioinks, often loaded with cells or growth factors, support cell delivery and guided differentiation. Across the dentin–pulp complex, periodontium, gingiva, salivary glands, peripheral nerves, cartilage, and craniofacial bone, preclinical studies report that bioprinted constructs can recreate tissue microarchitecture, enhance vascularization, and support partial functional repair. Whole-tooth and load-bearing bone regeneration remain constrained by spatial patterning, vascularization, and mechanical demands. Most evidence remains preclinical, and translation is limited by cost, fragmented workflows, biological and mechanical mismatch at tissue interfaces, and unclear regulatory pathways. Standardized fidelity and viability metrics, improved bioinks, and point-of-care workflows will be needed before bioprinting becomes part of routine oral regenerative care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb17110543
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Regenerative Medicine

Jinghao Wang, Yu‐Chi Cheng, Parham Hazrati, Zach Gouveia et al.
2 links
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Regenerative Medicine

Jinghao Wang, Yu‐Chi Cheng, Parham Hazrati, Zach Gouveia, David T. Wu, Michael Chen, Rodrigo Rangel, Kyle Wright, Jeffrey Pullano
article en

Abstract

Regeneration of the dental, oral, and craniofacial (DOC) complex is challenging because mineralized, soft, vascular, and neural tissues lie side by side, and defects are often large and irregular. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting enables fabrication of patient-specific, cell-laden constructs and may offer new regenerative options for complex oral cases. This narrative review summarizes current bioprinting technologies, their applications across DOC tissues, and the barriers to clinical adoption. Inkjet, laser-assisted, light-based, extrusion, and co-axial platforms differ in speed, resolution, cell viability, and cost, while intraoperative bioprinting allows constructs to be printed directly into the defect during surgery. Hydrogel-based bioinks, often loaded with cells or growth factors, support cell delivery and guided differentiation. Across the dentin–pulp complex, periodontium, gingiva, salivary glands, peripheral nerves, cartilage, and craniofacial bone, preclinical studies report that bioprinted constructs can recreate tissue microarchitecture, enhance vascularization, and support partial functional repair. Whole-tooth and load-bearing bone regeneration remain constrained by spatial patterning, vascularization, and mechanical demands. Most evidence remains preclinical, and translation is limited by cost, fragmented workflows, biological and mechanical mismatch at tissue interfaces, and unclear regulatory pathways. Standardized fidelity and viability metrics, improved bioinks, and point-of-care workflows will be needed before bioprinting becomes part of routine oral regenerative care.

Journal of Functional BiomaterialsVol. 17(11)
Tufts University (US), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering (US), McGill University (CA), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon