Improving Signals, Declining Encoder: A Known-Answer Test of Label-Free Monitoring in Self-Supervised Learning

Self-supervised training is monitored without labels, through the loss and statistics of the learned features. We report a case where we know the encoders lost part of what they had learned, so we can check whether these signals noticed. We trained LeJEPA encoders on synthetic images with known generating factors. In nine of ten seeds, the readability of those factors fell abruptly and stayed down, nearly always along the same direction in factor space. Meanwhile the loss kept falling, and most of the eleven label-free signals we tracked kept improving and rated the declining runs better than runs that did not decline. Standard change-point detection rarely flagged the decline near its onset, and selecting checkpoints by these signals mostly chose ones after it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.35766
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Improving Signals, Declining Encoder: A Known-Answer Test of Label-Free Monitoring in Self-Supervised Learning

Nilotpal Kakati
arXiv (Cornell University)
Machine Learning and Data Classification
preprint

Improving Signals, Declining Encoder: A Known-Answer Test of Label-Free Monitoring in Self-Supervised Learning

Nilotpal Kakati
preprint en

Abstract

Self-supervised training is monitored without labels, through the loss and statistics of the learned features. We report a case where we know the encoders lost part of what they had learned, so we can check whether these signals noticed. We trained LeJEPA encoders on synthetic images with known generating factors. In nine of ten seeds, the readability of those factors fell abruptly and stayed down, nearly always along the same direction in factor space. Meanwhile the loss kept falling, and most of the eleven label-free signals we tracked kept improving and rated the declining runs better than runs that did not decline. Standard change-point detection rarely flagged the decline near its onset, and selecting checkpoints by these signals mostly chose ones after it.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon