Overlooked and Undertreated: National Shortfalls in Anorectal Evaluation for Gastroparesis-Associated Constipation and Defecatory Disorders

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroparesis is a chronic motility disorder often accompanied by constipation. Defecation disorders are a common, treatable cause of refractory constipation; however, recognition and management in gastroparesis remain unclear. We assessed real-world rates of defecation disorder diagnosis and use of anorectal manometry (ARM) and pelvic floor therapies in gastroparesis with constipation and related healthcare utilization outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network (2000-2022). Adults with gastroparesis were identified, and rates of constipation, defecatory disorder diagnosis, ARM, biofeedback therapy (BFT), and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFT) were assessed. Among patients with gastroparesis and constipation, outcomes were compared between those with and without ARM after 1:1 propensity score matching. Outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalizations, abdominal imaging, nasogastric tube (NGT) placement, gastrostomy tube placement, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). RESULTS: Among 295,016 patients with gastroparesis, 88,062 (29.9%) had constipation, but only 4828 (1.4%) had a defecatory disorder diagnosis. Among those diagnosed, 1291 (33.3%) underwent ARM and 147 (3.8%) received BFT. After matching, Patients who underwent ARM had lower odds of NGT placement (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-0.80), abdominal imaging (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.78), emergency department visits (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.85), and hospitalizations (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.76). No significant differences were observed in TPN or gastrostomy tube placement. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-world cohort, defecatory disorders appear markedly underrecognized and pelvic floor-directed therapies were underutilized in gastroparesis-associated constipation. Patient who underwent Anorectal manometry had lower healthcare utilization, supporting earlier physiologic evaluation in refractory cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-026-10235-x
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overlooked and Undertreated: National Shortfalls in Anorectal Evaluation for Gastroparesis-Associated Constipation and Defecatory Disorders

Tareq Alsaleh, Mohamed H. Eldesouki, EzzElDien A. Ibrahim, Amol Sharma et al.
1 links
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Overlooked and Undertreated: National Shortfalls in Anorectal Evaluation for Gastroparesis-Associated Constipation and Defecatory Disorders

Tareq Alsaleh, Mohamed H. Eldesouki, EzzElDien A. Ibrahim, Amol Sharma, Swapna Gayam, Eslam Mohammed Rabea, Muhammad M. Elsharkawy, Mohamed Elzayat
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastroparesis is a chronic motility disorder often accompanied by constipation. Defecation disorders are a common, treatable cause of refractory constipation; however, recognition and management in gastroparesis remain unclear. We assessed real-world rates of defecation disorder diagnosis and use of anorectal manometry (ARM) and pelvic floor therapies in gastroparesis with constipation and related healthcare utilization outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network (2000-2022). Adults with gastroparesis were identified, and rates of constipation, defecatory disorder diagnosis, ARM, biofeedback therapy (BFT), and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFT) were assessed. Among patients with gastroparesis and constipation, outcomes were compared between those with and without ARM after 1:1 propensity score matching. Outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalizations, abdominal imaging, nasogastric tube (NGT) placement, gastrostomy tube placement, and total parenteral nutrition (TPN). RESULTS: Among 295,016 patients with gastroparesis, 88,062 (29.9%) had constipation, but only 4828 (1.4%) had a defecatory disorder diagnosis. Among those diagnosed, 1291 (33.3%) underwent ARM and 147 (3.8%) received BFT. After matching, Patients who underwent ARM had lower odds of NGT placement (aOR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-0.80), abdominal imaging (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.78), emergency department visits (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.85), and hospitalizations (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.76). No significant differences were observed in TPN or gastrostomy tube placement. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, real-world cohort, defecatory disorders appear markedly underrecognized and pelvic floor-directed therapies were underutilized in gastroparesis-associated constipation. Patient who underwent Anorectal manometry had lower healthcare utilization, supporting earlier physiologic evaluation in refractory cases.

Digestive Diseases and Sciences
West Virginia University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), New York Medical College (US), AdventHealth Orlando (US), Saint Michael's Medical Center (US), University of Missouri (US), Alexandria University (EG)
Medical University of South Carolina
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon