Media Multitasking and Cognitive Control: Small Linear Associations and No Evidence for an Inverted-U Relationship Across Seven Behavioral Paradigms
Background: Heavy media multitasking has been linked to poorer cognitive control, but findings are heterogeneous, and claims of an inverted-U relationship have rarely been tested with methods that establish curve shape. Methods: Using a publicly available dataset, we analyzed 278 adults who completed up to seven cognitive-control paradigms (219 completed all seven), yielding nine behavioral outcomes. The Media Multitasking Index (MMI) was treated as continuous. Linear and quadratic regressions were complemented by two-lines tests and restricted cubic splines for every outcome, and equivalence tests and Bayes factors quantified evidence for the null. Results: MMI showed a small negative linear association with cognitive control capacity and a small positive association with conflict-resolution efficiency; the latter was sensitive to the exclusion criterion. No outcome met the two-lines criterion for a U-shaped or inverted-U relationship. Reactive control showed curvature, but performance did not increase reliably at moderate MMI levels and declined at higher levels. Six of nine outcomes were statistically equivalent to zero (|r| < 0.20), with Bayes factors of 6.82–18.67 favoring the null. Conclusions: Associations between media multitasking and cognitive control are small, and an inverted-U relationship was not supported when curve shape was tested directly.
Authors
- Tour Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1186-2357)
- Yang Feng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-1576)
- Jianhao Qi
- Yunpeng Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4152-8368)
- Xia Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-2603)
- Sixuan Qi
- Ren Na
- Jingyan Liu
Institutions
- Tianjin Normal University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Behavioral Sciences
- Published
- 2026-10-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16111999
- Primary Topic
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00