Management Information System Innovation And Implementation Suitability In Managerial Decision Making

General Background Technological advancements mandate hospitals to integrate reliable administration systems for providing accountable healthcare services. Specific Background Hospital Management Information Systems supply crucial data assisting leaders in operational planning and strategic policy formulation. Knowledge Gap Although previous studies correlate system usage with staff performance, research simultaneously integrating information quality, operational capability, and system suitability toward managerial choices remains limited. Aims This study investigates how information quality, user competence, and implementation suitability determine managerial decision-making at RSUD Karangkembang Lamongan. Results Quantitative analysis of 30 employees using multiple linear regression reveals that information quality and user competence partially demonstrate no significant relationship with decision-making. Conversely, implementation suitability displays a positive and significant relationship. Simultaneously, all three variables determine 78.8% of the decision-making variance, establishing implementation suitability as the most dominant determinant. Novelty This research explicitly shifts the analytical focus from general clinical performance to the integration of systemic, human, and organizational factors driving strategic managerial choices. Implications Hospital administrators must prioritize aligning system features with organizational workflows rather than solely focusing on technical training or data availability to ensure optimal strategic planning. Highlights Workflow alignment acts as the dominant determinant for strategic planning operations. Technical competence alone does not directly guarantee better organizational choices without workflow synchronization. Systemic and human factors collectively determine a massive proportion of strategic choice variance. Keywords Hospital Management Information System; Information Quality; User Competence; Implementation Suitability; Managerial Decisions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v27i4.2413
Primary Topic
Decision Support System Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management Information System Innovation And Implementation Suitability In Managerial Decision Making

Vip Paramarta, ⁠Farida Yuliaty, Kosasih Kosasih, Taufan Nugroho et al.
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
Decision Support System Applications
article

Management Information System Innovation And Implementation Suitability In Managerial Decision Making

Vip Paramarta, ⁠Farida Yuliaty, Kosasih Kosasih, Taufan Nugroho, Yuli Anggraini
article en

Abstract

General Background Technological advancements mandate hospitals to integrate reliable administration systems for providing accountable healthcare services. Specific Background Hospital Management Information Systems supply crucial data assisting leaders in operational planning and strategic policy formulation. Knowledge Gap Although previous studies correlate system usage with staff performance, research simultaneously integrating information quality, operational capability, and system suitability toward managerial choices remains limited. Aims This study investigates how information quality, user competence, and implementation suitability determine managerial decision-making at RSUD Karangkembang Lamongan. Results Quantitative analysis of 30 employees using multiple linear regression reveals that information quality and user competence partially demonstrate no significant relationship with decision-making. Conversely, implementation suitability displays a positive and significant relationship. Simultaneously, all three variables determine 78.8% of the decision-making variance, establishing implementation suitability as the most dominant determinant. Novelty This research explicitly shifts the analytical focus from general clinical performance to the integration of systemic, human, and organizational factors driving strategic managerial choices. Implications Hospital administrators must prioritize aligning system features with organizational workflows rather than solely focusing on technical training or data availability to ensure optimal strategic planning. Highlights Workflow alignment acts as the dominant determinant for strategic planning operations. Technical competence alone does not directly guarantee better organizational choices without workflow synchronization. Systemic and human factors collectively determine a massive proportion of strategic choice variance. Keywords Hospital Management Information System; Information Quality; User Competence; Implementation Suitability; Managerial Decisions

Indonesian Journal of Innovation StudiesVol. 27(4)
Universitas Sangga Buana YPKP (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Decision Support System Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon