A bias-aware indicator framework for prioritizing surveys of data-deficient freshwater leeches in China

Sparse and spatially biased occurrence records complicate survey planning for freshwater invertebrates. We evaluated a bias-aware indicator framework linking taxon documentation with a fixed 40:40:20 ranking of environmental similarity to documented occurrence contexts, documentation gap and freshwater support. Contemporary accessibility was evaluated separately to characterize documentation associations and inform survey logistics. Habitat-scope and coordinate audits retained 198 records representing 44 freshwater leech taxa in China; 88.6% of taxa had fewer than ten records. Using 197 predictor-eligible records and 4907 freshwater-background points, random-record validation indicated repeatable environmental structure within the compiled dataset (median background-rank AUC = 0.753). Geographically blocked transfer was weak (AUC = 0.511) but exceeded a randomized-reference median of 0.293 ( p = 0.005). At 50 two-degree cells selected nationally within each fold, the reference recovered 55.3% of held-out records but none in two folds. Environmental similarity plus documentation gap recovered 57.9%; relative performance changed with budget. A 75:25 acquisition–exploration portfolio recovered 56.3% with a smaller environmental coverage gap (1.048 versus 1.364); a 50:50 portfolio retained 52.0%. An external retrospective cell-level adaptation using 158 filtered Procambarus clarkii records recovered 22/36 held-out record-containing cells versus a random median of six ( p = 0.001). Environmental transfer was heterogeneous, and the aggregate randomized-reference comparison was inconclusive (weighted AUC = 0.629; null median = 0.564; p = 0.0939). National mapping identified 985 freshwater-background points meeting both environmental-similarity and documentation-gap criteria. These comparisons expose budget-dependent indicator value and acquisition–coverage trade-offs, not validated field priorities or ecological learning. Standardized prospective surveys are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2026.115768
Primary Topic
Leech Biology and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A bias-aware indicator framework for prioritizing surveys of data-deficient freshwater leeches in China

Nawaz Haider Bashir, Maryam Riasat, Tahir Farooq, Huanhuan Chen et al.
1 links
Ecological Indicators
Leech Biology and Applications
article

A bias-aware indicator framework for prioritizing surveys of data-deficient freshwater leeches in China

Nawaz Haider Bashir, Maryam Riasat, Tahir Farooq, Huanhuan Chen, Muhammad Naeem
article en

Abstract

Sparse and spatially biased occurrence records complicate survey planning for freshwater invertebrates. We evaluated a bias-aware indicator framework linking taxon documentation with a fixed 40:40:20 ranking of environmental similarity to documented occurrence contexts, documentation gap and freshwater support. Contemporary accessibility was evaluated separately to characterize documentation associations and inform survey logistics. Habitat-scope and coordinate audits retained 198 records representing 44 freshwater leech taxa in China; 88.6% of taxa had fewer than ten records. Using 197 predictor-eligible records and 4907 freshwater-background points, random-record validation indicated repeatable environmental structure within the compiled dataset (median background-rank AUC = 0.753). Geographically blocked transfer was weak (AUC = 0.511) but exceeded a randomized-reference median of 0.293 ( p = 0.005). At 50 two-degree cells selected nationally within each fold, the reference recovered 55.3% of held-out records but none in two folds. Environmental similarity plus documentation gap recovered 57.9%; relative performance changed with budget. A 75:25 acquisition–exploration portfolio recovered 56.3% with a smaller environmental coverage gap (1.048 versus 1.364); a 50:50 portfolio retained 52.0%. An external retrospective cell-level adaptation using 158 filtered Procambarus clarkii records recovered 22/36 held-out record-containing cells versus a random median of six ( p = 0.001). Environmental transfer was heterogeneous, and the aggregate randomized-reference comparison was inconclusive (weighted AUC = 0.629; null median = 0.564; p = 0.0939). National mapping identified 985 freshwater-background points meeting both environmental-similarity and documentation-gap criteria. These comparisons expose budget-dependent indicator value and acquisition–coverage trade-offs, not validated field priorities or ecological learning. Standardized prospective surveys are required.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 192
Riphah International University (PK), Qujing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Leech Biology and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon