A randomised controlled trial on the effect of ultrasound cavitation on insulin resistance, abdominal skinfold thickness, and waist-to-hip ratio in women with central obesity

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrasound cavitation on insulin resistance, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and abdominal skinfold thickness in women with central obesity. Methods A total of 52 women aged 25–40 years with the mean age of 32.9 ± 4.2 years with central obesity were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (ultrasound cavitation, aerobic exercise, and a low-calorie diet) or a control group (aerobic exercise and a low-calorie diet). Randomisation was computer-generated; outcome assessors were blinded. The intervention occurred twice weekly for 6 weeks. Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Insulin resistance was measured using the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), abdominal skinfold thickness with Lange callipers, and WHR with a non-elastic tape. Normality was confirmed via the Shapiro–Wilk test, and homoscedasticity was verified. Parametric tests including paired t-tests and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were applied, with Bonferroni correction used for multiple comparisons. Results The experimental group showed reductions of 23% in HOMA-IR (mean change: −0.64 ± 0.2), 7% in abdominal skinfold thickness (2.4 ± 0.5 mm), and 8% in waist-to-hip ratio (7.5 ± 1.2). In contrast, the control group demonstrated smaller reductions of 5% (0.13 ± 0.2), 0.5% (0.16 ± 0.1 mm), and 0.7% (0.63 ± 0.2), respectively. Between-group differences in all three obesity markers were statistically significant (p < 0.05), favouring the experimental group. Conclusions Ultrasound cavitation, combined with exercise and dietary interventions, significantly improves insulin resistance and central obesity markers. This finding supports its use as a non-invasive metabolic intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physiotherapy Quarterly
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/pq/208118
Primary Topic
Body Contouring and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomised controlled trial on the effect of ultrasound cavitation on insulin resistance, abdominal skinfold thickness, and waist-to-hip ratio in women with central obesity

Magda Gaid Sedhom, Ayah Mohmoud Mohamed, Hanan Mohamed El Tokhy, Maher Ahmed El Keblawy et al.
Physiotherapy Quarterly
Body Contouring and Surgery
article

A randomised controlled trial on the effect of ultrasound cavitation on insulin resistance, abdominal skinfold thickness, and waist-to-hip ratio in women with central obesity

Magda Gaid Sedhom, Ayah Mohmoud Mohamed, Hanan Mohamed El Tokhy, Maher Ahmed El Keblawy, Aya Saeed Shazly
article en

Abstract

Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ultrasound cavitation on insulin resistance, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and abdominal skinfold thickness in women with central obesity. Methods A total of 52 women aged 25–40 years with the mean age of 32.9 ± 4.2 years with central obesity were randomly assigned to either an experimental group (ultrasound cavitation, aerobic exercise, and a low-calorie diet) or a control group (aerobic exercise and a low-calorie diet). Randomisation was computer-generated; outcome assessors were blinded. The intervention occurred twice weekly for 6 weeks. Outcomes were assessed pre- and post-treatment. Insulin resistance was measured using the Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), abdominal skinfold thickness with Lange callipers, and WHR with a non-elastic tape. Normality was confirmed via the Shapiro–Wilk test, and homoscedasticity was verified. Parametric tests including paired t-tests and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were applied, with Bonferroni correction used for multiple comparisons. Results The experimental group showed reductions of 23% in HOMA-IR (mean change: −0.64 ± 0.2), 7% in abdominal skinfold thickness (2.4 ± 0.5 mm), and 8% in waist-to-hip ratio (7.5 ± 1.2). In contrast, the control group demonstrated smaller reductions of 5% (0.13 ± 0.2), 0.5% (0.16 ± 0.1 mm), and 0.7% (0.63 ± 0.2), respectively. Between-group differences in all three obesity markers were statistically significant (p < 0.05), favouring the experimental group. Conclusions Ultrasound cavitation, combined with exercise and dietary interventions, significantly improves insulin resistance and central obesity markers. This finding supports its use as a non-invasive metabolic intervention.

Physiotherapy Quarterly
Cairo University (EG), Al-Azhar University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Body Contouring and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon