Turing-like tests for language and vision demonstrate a narrowing gap between humans and AI

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in daily life, ascertaining whether an agent is human is critical. Here we systematically benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks (image captioning, word association and conversation) and three vision tasks (colour estimation, object detection and attention prediction), collecting data from n = 636 humans and 37 AI agents. We also conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges. Current AIs are approaching the ability to convincingly impersonate humans and deceive human judges in both language and vision. Even simple AI judges outperformed humans in distinguishing AI from human responses. Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics, suggesting that passing as human is an important independent evaluation criterion. The large-scale Turing-like datasets and metrics introduced here offer valuable benchmarks for assessing human-likeness in AI and highlight the importance of rigorous, quantitative imitation tests for AI development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02590-6
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turing-like tests for language and vision demonstrate a narrowing gap between humans and AI

Shui’er Han, Andrei Barbu, Marcelo Armendáriz, Ankur Sikarwar et al.
1 links
Nature Human Behaviour
Artificial Intelligence Applications
article

Turing-like tests for language and vision demonstrate a narrowing gap between humans and AI

Shui’er Han, Andrei Barbu, Marcelo Armendáriz, Ankur Sikarwar, Caishun Chen, Spandan Madan, Mengmi Zhang, Hanspeter Pfister, Brandon Tang, Michele Pizzochero, Giorgia Dellaferrera, Meghna Sadwani, Yew-Soon Ong, Noga Mudrik, Stella Dellaferrera, Gabriel Kreiman, Haochen Yang, Aman Singh, Tanishq Kumar, Elisa Pavarino, Xiao Liu, Prachi Agrawal, Mranmay Shetty
article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly embedded in daily life, ascertaining whether an agent is human is critical. Here we systematically benchmark AI's ability to imitate humans in three language tasks (image captioning, word association and conversation) and three vision tasks (colour estimation, object detection and attention prediction), collecting data from n = 636 humans and 37 AI agents. We also conducted 72,191 Turing-like tests with 1,916 human judges and 10 AI judges. Current AIs are approaching the ability to convincingly impersonate humans and deceive human judges in both language and vision. Even simple AI judges outperformed humans in distinguishing AI from human responses. Imitation ability showed minimal correlation with conventional AI performance metrics, suggesting that passing as human is an important independent evaluation criterion. The large-scale Turing-like datasets and metrics introduced here offer valuable benchmarks for assessing human-likeness in AI and highlight the importance of rigorous, quantitative imitation tests for AI development.

Nature Human Behaviour
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College Hospital (IN), Nanyang Technological University (SG), University of Zurich (CH), Symbiosis International University (IN), ETH Zurich (CH), IBM Research - Zurich (CH), Institute of Neuroinformatics (CH), MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US), Institute of Advanced Intelligence and Computing (SG), University of Bath (GB), University of Turin (IT), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
National Science Foundation, Harvard University, Johns Hopkins University, University of Bath, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Nanyang Technological University, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, Università degli Studi di Torino, National Institutes of Health, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon