United States Prosperity and the Limits of Inclusive Belonging: A Five Objective Comparison with Europe North America and Asia

This paper examines the United States through the Economics of Belonging, assessing five objectives: growth, stability, distribution, human capabilities, and social and institutional belonging. Drawing on an audited 55-country database, it compares the American profile with Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and China. The United States combines high income, extensive schooling, and strong perceived neighbor care with substantial inequality, shorter life expectancy than many advanced-economy comparators, comparatively weak perceived governmental care, and high reported discrimination. A central contribution distinguishes reported discrimination from statistical scores adjusted for relative income and freedom of expression. Across 53 countries with available observations, the American reported value of 50.52% corresponds to a jointly adjusted score of 45.08 at common reference conditions. Substantial differences remain relative to the selected European countries, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and South Korea. The US–China comparison is sensitive to model specification: the gap narrows under the linear adjustment and reverses under a bounded nonlinear alternative. These adjustments are descriptive diagnostics, not estimates of the true incidence of discrimination or causal effects. The paper develops a comparative research agenda connecting economic resources to effective participation, institutional access, human capabilities, and social recognition while preserving individual initiative and freedom of expression. The main data used in this study are available in the replication package accompanying The Economics of Belonging: Measuring Economic and Social Achievement across Nations (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23603825). A supplementary archive, United_States_Belonging_Replication.zip (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23674517), provides the analysis files and code needed to reproduce the calculations reported in this article.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23675287
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

United States Prosperity and the Limits of Inclusive Belonging: A Five Objective Comparison with Europe North America and Asia

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
preprint

United States Prosperity and the Limits of Inclusive Belonging: A Five Objective Comparison with Europe North America and Asia

Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz
preprint en

Abstract

This paper examines the United States through the Economics of Belonging, assessing five objectives: growth, stability, distribution, human capabilities, and social and institutional belonging. Drawing on an audited 55-country database, it compares the American profile with Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Sweden, Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and China. The United States combines high income, extensive schooling, and strong perceived neighbor care with substantial inequality, shorter life expectancy than many advanced-economy comparators, comparatively weak perceived governmental care, and high reported discrimination. A central contribution distinguishes reported discrimination from statistical scores adjusted for relative income and freedom of expression. Across 53 countries with available observations, the American reported value of 50.52% corresponds to a jointly adjusted score of 45.08 at common reference conditions. Substantial differences remain relative to the selected European countries, Canada, Mexico, Japan, and South Korea. The US–China comparison is sensitive to model specification: the gap narrows under the linear adjustment and reverses under a bounded nonlinear alternative. These adjustments are descriptive diagnostics, not estimates of the true incidence of discrimination or causal effects. The paper develops a comparative research agenda connecting economic resources to effective participation, institutional access, human capabilities, and social recognition while preserving individual initiative and freedom of expression. The main data used in this study are available in the replication package accompanying The Economics of Belonging: Measuring Economic and Social Achievement across Nations (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23603825). A supplementary archive, United_States_Belonging_Replication.zip (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23674517), provides the analysis files and code needed to reproduce the calculations reported in this article.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
United States Prosperity and the Limits of Inclusive Belonging: A Five Objective Comparison with Europe North America and Asia — Carlos Federico Obregon Diaz · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS