Compression therapy for leg ulcers: Time to move beyond dogmas. Real-world pressure measurements reveal very strong compression at application and an antigraduated pressure profile

IntroductionCompression therapy is a cornerstone of venous leg ulcer management, yet many recommendations on optimal compression pressure and the need for graduated pressure profiles are based on limited clinical evidence or theoretical assumptions, as only a few objective data are available. The lack of routine pressure assessment has contributed to persistent assumptions and controversies. This study aimed to evaluate the compression pressures and pressure distribution profiles applied by experienced clinicians in their routine clinical practice.MethodsA multicenter observational study was conducted during Phlebology and Wound Care meetings. One hundred clinicians experienced in compression bandaging applied their usual inelastic compression systems to fellow volunteer clinicians. Compression pressure was recorded using a device with sensors at three points on the lower leg: B (ankle region), B1 (lower calf), and C (mid-to high-calf). Pressure at point B1 was used as the reference compression pressure, and pressure profiles were analyzed.ResultsThe median compression pressures were 52 mmHg (IQR 44-64) at point B, 60 mmHg (IQR 45-71) at point B1, and 55 mmHg (IQR 43-69) at point C. Only 15% of clinicians applied pressures ≤40 mmHg, whereas 66% applied pressures >50 mmHg. A traditionally graduated pressure profile was observed in only 13% of applications. In contrast, 87% of clinicians produced non-graduated profiles, including inverse-graduated or progressive profiles (23%), pressure peaking at point B1 (40%), or other atypical patterns (24%). In all non-graduated profiles, calf pressure exceeded ankle pressure.ConclusionsIn routine practice, experienced clinicians commonly apply strong compression pressures well above 40 mmHg and rarely achieve a graduated pressure profile. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about the application of compression and underscore the importance of objective pressure measurements to guide future research, guidelines, and clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555261503727
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compression therapy for leg ulcers: Time to move beyond dogmas. Real-world pressure measurements reveal very strong compression at application and an antigraduated pressure profile

Giovanni Battista Mosti, Jean‐Patrick Benigni, Andrew Cameron
Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Compression therapy for leg ulcers: Time to move beyond dogmas. Real-world pressure measurements reveal very strong compression at application and an antigraduated pressure profile

Giovanni Battista Mosti, Jean‐Patrick Benigni, Andrew Cameron
article en

Abstract

IntroductionCompression therapy is a cornerstone of venous leg ulcer management, yet many recommendations on optimal compression pressure and the need for graduated pressure profiles are based on limited clinical evidence or theoretical assumptions, as only a few objective data are available. The lack of routine pressure assessment has contributed to persistent assumptions and controversies. This study aimed to evaluate the compression pressures and pressure distribution profiles applied by experienced clinicians in their routine clinical practice.MethodsA multicenter observational study was conducted during Phlebology and Wound Care meetings. One hundred clinicians experienced in compression bandaging applied their usual inelastic compression systems to fellow volunteer clinicians. Compression pressure was recorded using a device with sensors at three points on the lower leg: B (ankle region), B1 (lower calf), and C (mid-to high-calf). Pressure at point B1 was used as the reference compression pressure, and pressure profiles were analyzed.ResultsThe median compression pressures were 52 mmHg (IQR 44-64) at point B, 60 mmHg (IQR 45-71) at point B1, and 55 mmHg (IQR 43-69) at point C. Only 15% of clinicians applied pressures ≤40 mmHg, whereas 66% applied pressures >50 mmHg. A traditionally graduated pressure profile was observed in only 13% of applications. In contrast, 87% of clinicians produced non-graduated profiles, including inverse-graduated or progressive profiles (23%), pressure peaking at point B1 (40%), or other atypical patterns (24%). In all non-graduated profiles, calf pressure exceeded ankle pressure.ConclusionsIn routine practice, experienced clinicians commonly apply strong compression pressures well above 40 mmHg and rarely achieve a graduated pressure profile. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions about the application of compression and underscore the importance of objective pressure measurements to guide future research, guidelines, and clinical practice.

Phlebology The Journal of Venous Disease
Sorbonne Université (FR), Cheltenham Festivals (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon