The design of an orthodontic patient information leaflet: a cross-sectional, mixed methods study involving surveys, a knowledge test and eye-tracking

Background: Patient Information Leaflets (PILs) are widely used to support verbal communication during orthodontic consent. For a PIL to be effective, it must present information clearly and support patient understanding and recall. A commonly used orthodontic PIL in the UK is the British Orthodontic Society's (BOS) PIL "Orthodontic Treatment: What are the risks?". Aim and objectives: To evaluate this orthodontic PIL, compared to a simpler Designed to Smile PIL, with regards to: 1) Design clarity; 2) Free text comments on the design and content; 3) Knowledge after reading the PIL; 4) Time spent looking at various aspects of the PIL. Methods: Students of non-medicine or dentistry programmes viewed the orthodontic PIL electronically with simultaneous eye-tracking. Immediately afterwards, they completed a survey capturing their clarity of design rating, feedback on the design and content, and knowledge of the PIL content. This was repeated for a simpler Designed to Smile PIL. Results: 36.8% rated the orthodontic PIL as "very clear" compared to 66% for the Designed to Smile PIL. Suggested improvements included breaking-up large blocks of text, using more images, and including descriptions of patient experience. 48.9% (SD = 9.0) of questions were answered correctly regarding content in the orthodontic PIL; significantly lower than the simpler Designed to Smile PIL (80%; SD = 11.3%) (P < 0.001). Eye-tracking indicated that participants spent more time looking at images in the orthodontic PIL (median = 22.2% of time) compared to the Designed to Smile PIL (median = 8.2%) (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The Designed to Smile PIL was deemed clearer than the orthodontic PIL. Suggestions for improvement included using more images and breaking-up large sections of text. Knowledge was relatively poor after reading the orthodontic PIL. Participants spent longer looking at the images in the orthodontic PIL compared to the Designed to Smile PIL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.25.26366089
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The design of an orthodontic patient information leaflet: a cross-sectional, mixed methods study involving surveys, a knowledge test and eye-tracking

Jennifer Galloway, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL, Aik Jin Kho
medRxiv
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
preprint

The design of an orthodontic patient information leaflet: a cross-sectional, mixed methods study involving surveys, a knowledge test and eye-tracking

Jennifer Galloway, DAMIAN J. J. FARNELL, Aik Jin Kho
preprint en

Abstract

Background: Patient Information Leaflets (PILs) are widely used to support verbal communication during orthodontic consent. For a PIL to be effective, it must present information clearly and support patient understanding and recall. A commonly used orthodontic PIL in the UK is the British Orthodontic Society's (BOS) PIL "Orthodontic Treatment: What are the risks?". Aim and objectives: To evaluate this orthodontic PIL, compared to a simpler Designed to Smile PIL, with regards to: 1) Design clarity; 2) Free text comments on the design and content; 3) Knowledge after reading the PIL; 4) Time spent looking at various aspects of the PIL. Methods: Students of non-medicine or dentistry programmes viewed the orthodontic PIL electronically with simultaneous eye-tracking. Immediately afterwards, they completed a survey capturing their clarity of design rating, feedback on the design and content, and knowledge of the PIL content. This was repeated for a simpler Designed to Smile PIL. Results: 36.8% rated the orthodontic PIL as "very clear" compared to 66% for the Designed to Smile PIL. Suggested improvements included breaking-up large blocks of text, using more images, and including descriptions of patient experience. 48.9% (SD = 9.0) of questions were answered correctly regarding content in the orthodontic PIL; significantly lower than the simpler Designed to Smile PIL (80%; SD = 11.3%) (P < 0.001). Eye-tracking indicated that participants spent more time looking at images in the orthodontic PIL (median = 22.2% of time) compared to the Designed to Smile PIL (median = 8.2%) (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The Designed to Smile PIL was deemed clearer than the orthodontic PIL. Suggestions for improvement included using more images and breaking-up large sections of text. Knowledge was relatively poor after reading the orthodontic PIL. Participants spent longer looking at the images in the orthodontic PIL compared to the Designed to Smile PIL.

medRxiv
University of Glasgow (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon