The Concept of Control in the UNIDROIT Principles on Digital Assets and Private Law

The article analyzes the possibility of applying Unidroit Principles on Digital Assets to cryptoassets through the lens of adapting traditional real-law structures to the realities of the digital economy. It has been established that the traditional doctrine of ownership, rooted in the material world, does not allow the full extension of the real-legal regime to intangible objects, which creates “legal discrimination” of crypto assets. It is determined that the concept of “control” proposed by the Unidroit Principles on Digital Assets, designed to become the functional equivalent of ownership, demonstrates significant differences when compared with Russian civil law: control is a purely factual category that does not require will and does not allow indirect implementation, unlike the legal and factual nature of ownership. The conclusion is made about the inexpediency of directly borrowing the concept of control, but the necessity of using the Unidroit Principles as a guideline for the modernization of domestic legislation is substantiated. It is proposed to supplement Article 209 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation with the concept of “control” in relation to digital assets, which will allow maintaining a single ownership regime, adapting it to the realities of distributed registry systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JURIST
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2026-10-18-22
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concept of Control in the UNIDROIT Principles on Digital Assets and Private Law

Ruslan Mamedov
JURIST
Digital Transformation in Law
article

The Concept of Control in the UNIDROIT Principles on Digital Assets and Private Law

Ruslan Mamedov
article en

Abstract

The article analyzes the possibility of applying Unidroit Principles on Digital Assets to cryptoassets through the lens of adapting traditional real-law structures to the realities of the digital economy. It has been established that the traditional doctrine of ownership, rooted in the material world, does not allow the full extension of the real-legal regime to intangible objects, which creates “legal discrimination” of crypto assets. It is determined that the concept of “control” proposed by the Unidroit Principles on Digital Assets, designed to become the functional equivalent of ownership, demonstrates significant differences when compared with Russian civil law: control is a purely factual category that does not require will and does not allow indirect implementation, unlike the legal and factual nature of ownership. The conclusion is made about the inexpediency of directly borrowing the concept of control, but the necessity of using the Unidroit Principles as a guideline for the modernization of domestic legislation is substantiated. It is proposed to supplement Article 209 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation with the concept of “control” in relation to digital assets, which will allow maintaining a single ownership regime, adapting it to the realities of distributed registry systems.

JURIST
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Digital Transformation in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon