Experience with AI-assisted Fracture Detection at a Pediatric Hospital

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in radiology. For pediatric patients, the only commercially available computer-aided detection/diagnosis tool currently available is for fracture detection. Here, our experience at a pediatric hospital with a 2-month trial of a commercial AI fracture-detection tool is described. Although the tool was sometimes helpful, particularly for subtle fractures and as confirmatory support in borderline cases, its overall value was limited by cost, false-positive and false-negative results, workflow inconsistency, and the burden of post-deployment monitoring. In our experience, aggregate performance alone did not capture the practical issues most relevant to clinical adoption, including delayed or missing AI results, provider confusion when AI and radiologist interpretations differed, and the infrastructure required for sustainable oversight. Our experience suggests that fracture-detection AI should be evaluated not only by diagnostic performance, but also by real-world clinical utility, workflow reliability, and implementation burden and provides real-word insight into these issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2964-5429
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience with AI-assisted Fracture Detection at a Pediatric Hospital

Andrew C. Sher, Marla B. K. Sammer
Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Experience with AI-assisted Fracture Detection at a Pediatric Hospital

Andrew C. Sher, Marla B. K. Sammer
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in radiology. For pediatric patients, the only commercially available computer-aided detection/diagnosis tool currently available is for fracture detection. Here, our experience at a pediatric hospital with a 2-month trial of a commercial AI fracture-detection tool is described. Although the tool was sometimes helpful, particularly for subtle fractures and as confirmatory support in borderline cases, its overall value was limited by cost, false-positive and false-negative results, workflow inconsistency, and the burden of post-deployment monitoring. In our experience, aggregate performance alone did not capture the practical issues most relevant to clinical adoption, including delayed or missing AI results, provider confusion when AI and radiologist interpretations differed, and the infrastructure required for sustainable oversight. Our experience suggests that fracture-detection AI should be evaluated not only by diagnostic performance, but also by real-world clinical utility, workflow reliability, and implementation burden and provides real-word insight into these issues.

Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
Baylor College of Medicine (US), Texas Children's Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Experience with AI-assisted Fracture Detection at a Pediatric Hospital — Andrew C. Sher, Marla B. K. Sammer · Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS