FIRST-ORDER DISTINGUISHABILITY OF SPARSE RANDOM GRAPHS

Abstract We study the problem of distinguishing between two independent samples G n 1 , G n 2 $\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$ bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2 of a binomial random graph G ( n , p ) $G(n,p)$ upper G left parenthesis n comma p right parenthesis by first-order (FO) sentences. Shelah and Spencer proved that, for a constant α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis , G ( n , n − α ) $G(n,n^{-\alpha })$ upper G left parenthesis n comma n Superscript negative alpha Baseline right parenthesis obeys FO zero-one law if and only if α $\alpha $ alpha is irrational. Therefore, for irrational α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis , any fixed FO sentence does not distinguish between G n 1 , G n 2

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Symbolic Logic
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jsl.2026.10271
Primary Topic
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FIRST-ORDER DISTINGUISHABILITY OF SPARSE RANDOM GRAPHS

Maksim Evgen'evich Zhukovskii, Tal Hershko
Journal of Symbolic Logic
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
article

FIRST-ORDER DISTINGUISHABILITY OF SPARSE RANDOM GRAPHS

Maksim Evgen'evich Zhukovskii, Tal Hershko
article en

Abstract

Abstract We study the problem of distinguishing between two independent samples G n 1 , G n 2 $\mathbf {G}_n^1,\mathbf {G}_n^2$ bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 1 Baseline comma bold upper G Subscript n Superscript 2 of a binomial random graph G ( n , p ) $G(n,p)$ upper G left parenthesis n comma p right parenthesis by first-order (FO) sentences. Shelah and Spencer proved that, for a constant α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis , G ( n , n − α ) $G(n,n^{-\alpha })$ upper G left parenthesis n comma n Superscript negative alpha Baseline right parenthesis obeys FO zero-one law if and only if α $\alpha $ alpha is irrational. Therefore, for irrational α ∈ ( 0 , 1 ) $\alpha \in (0,1)$ alpha element of left parenthesis 0 comma 1 right parenthesis , any fixed FO sentence does not distinguish between G n 1 , G n 2

Journal of Symbolic Logic
California Institute of Technology (US), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
FIRST-ORDER DISTINGUISHABILITY OF SPARSE RANDOM GRAPHS — Maksim Evgen'evich Zhukovskii, Tal Hershko · Journal of Symbolic Logic (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS