Executive decision support for managing AI risk in public health

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming public health decision-making, shifting it from descriptive epidemiological reporting to predictive, accelerated operational guidance. Yet AI in public health is discussed almost entirely at technical or regulatory levels, leaving a gap in executive-level guidance. Public health operates within a complex landscape of social determinants, political scrutiny, and incomplete information, where algorithmic errors can severely damage public trust. Consequently, executive competency must expand beyond traditional data interpretation to foundational AI literacy. Leaders must differentiate among diverse AI applications and evaluate their risk profiles, including balancing AI trained on individual-level precision medicine models with public health population-level prevention mandate. Continuous human oversight and multidisciplinary validation should be standard for modern public health organizations. Automated systems must equitably advance population health outcomes under final human authority at all times. Public health executives can better prepare to make informed decisions about AI-related risks using the decision points presented in this commentary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Health
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2026.1610326
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Executive decision support for managing AI risk in public health

Долапо Факуаде, Olusimbo Ige
International Journal of Public Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Executive decision support for managing AI risk in public health

Долапо Факуаде, Olusimbo Ige
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming public health decision-making, shifting it from descriptive epidemiological reporting to predictive, accelerated operational guidance. Yet AI in public health is discussed almost entirely at technical or regulatory levels, leaving a gap in executive-level guidance. Public health operates within a complex landscape of social determinants, political scrutiny, and incomplete information, where algorithmic errors can severely damage public trust. Consequently, executive competency must expand beyond traditional data interpretation to foundational AI literacy. Leaders must differentiate among diverse AI applications and evaluate their risk profiles, including balancing AI trained on individual-level precision medicine models with public health population-level prevention mandate. Continuous human oversight and multidisciplinary validation should be standard for modern public health organizations. Automated systems must equitably advance population health outcomes under final human authority at all times. Public health executives can better prepare to make informed decisions about AI-related risks using the decision points presented in this commentary.

International Journal of Public HealthVol. 71
Chicago Department of Public Health (US), Coventry University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Executive decision support for managing AI risk in public health — Долапо Факуаде, Olusimbo Ige · International Journal of Public Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS