Blood‐ and Liver Stiffness‐Based Non‐Invasive Tests for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients With cACLD and HCC
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The applicability of non-invasive tests (NITs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. We performed a head-to-head comparison of various NITs for CSPH and evaluated rule-in/-out criteria. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 283 patients with HCC undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement at the Vienna Hepatic Haemodynamic Lab with available, same-day data on NITs (i.e., liver stiffness measurement [LSM], platelet count [PLT], von Willebrand factor antigen [VWF:Ag], and the ratio of VWF:Ag and PLT [VITRO]). For the subsequent analysis, we focused on patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). RESULTS: Among 164 patients with cACLD, most were BCLC 0/A (50.6%) and CSPH prevalence was 46.3%, the median LSM was 20.0 kPa (IQR: 13.3-37.9), and mean VWF:Ag/VITRO was 266 ± 119%/2.30 ± 1.81. The VITRO score yielded the highest discriminative ability to detect CSPH (AUROC: 0.834), followed by ANTICIPATE ± NASH (AUROC: 0.822), PLT (AUROC: 0.803), LSM (AUROC: 0.779), and VWF:Ag (AUROC: 0.707). The application of the Baveno VII criterium (LSM ≤ 15 kPa & PLT ≥ 150G/L) and the VITRO score (≤ 1.0) individually showed an excellent performance for ruling-out CSPH (sensitivities: ≥ 95%, NPV: 100%/87.9%). For ruling-in CSPH by individual criteria, the VITRO score provided the highest PPV (≥ 2.5, specificity/PPV: 89.8%/83.0%), followed by the Baveno VII criteria (specificity/PPV: 81.8%/74.6%). When sequentially applying Baveno VII criteria and VITRO, the grey zone could be significantly reduced to 16% (sensitivity/NPV: 94.7%/92.2%; specificity/PPV: 73.9%/84.4%). CONCLUSION: The discriminative ability in patients with cACLD and HCC was comparable to patients without HCC. However, PPVs of established criteria were < 90%, which may be explained by the comparatively low prevalence of CSPH in this context.
Authors
- Christoph C. Schwarz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-2779)
- Mattias Mandorfer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-0017)
- Patrick P. Starlinger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4666-5337)
- Peter Quehenberger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0122-8213)
- Benedikt Simbrunner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8181-9146)
- David Pereyra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6700-9163)
- Bernhard Scheiner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4904-5133)
- Stefan Stremitzer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4815-4135)
- Matthias Pinter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7260-532X)
- Klaus Kaczirek (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2156-4377)
- Georg Semmler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-166X)
- Thomas Reiberger (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-3583)
- Albert Friedrich Stättermayer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0737-4091)
- Mathias Jachs (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2871-4147)
- Michael A Trauner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1275-6425)
- Lorenz Balcar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6708-3061)
- Tina Jasmin Haunold
Institutions
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Liver International
- Published
- 2026-10-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.70947
- Primary Topic
- Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft