Blood‐ and Liver Stiffness‐Based Non‐Invasive Tests for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients With cACLD and HCC

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The applicability of non-invasive tests (NITs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. We performed a head-to-head comparison of various NITs for CSPH and evaluated rule-in/-out criteria. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 283 patients with HCC undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement at the Vienna Hepatic Haemodynamic Lab with available, same-day data on NITs (i.e., liver stiffness measurement [LSM], platelet count [PLT], von Willebrand factor antigen [VWF:Ag], and the ratio of VWF:Ag and PLT [VITRO]). For the subsequent analysis, we focused on patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). RESULTS: Among 164 patients with cACLD, most were BCLC 0/A (50.6%) and CSPH prevalence was 46.3%, the median LSM was 20.0 kPa (IQR: 13.3-37.9), and mean VWF:Ag/VITRO was 266 ± 119%/2.30 ± 1.81. The VITRO score yielded the highest discriminative ability to detect CSPH (AUROC: 0.834), followed by ANTICIPATE ± NASH (AUROC: 0.822), PLT (AUROC: 0.803), LSM (AUROC: 0.779), and VWF:Ag (AUROC: 0.707). The application of the Baveno VII criterium (LSM ≤ 15 kPa & PLT ≥ 150G/L) and the VITRO score (≤ 1.0) individually showed an excellent performance for ruling-out CSPH (sensitivities: ≥ 95%, NPV: 100%/87.9%). For ruling-in CSPH by individual criteria, the VITRO score provided the highest PPV (≥ 2.5, specificity/PPV: 89.8%/83.0%), followed by the Baveno VII criteria (specificity/PPV: 81.8%/74.6%). When sequentially applying Baveno VII criteria and VITRO, the grey zone could be significantly reduced to 16% (sensitivity/NPV: 94.7%/92.2%; specificity/PPV: 73.9%/84.4%). CONCLUSION: The discriminative ability in patients with cACLD and HCC was comparable to patients without HCC. However, PPVs of established criteria were < 90%, which may be explained by the comparatively low prevalence of CSPH in this context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver International
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.70947
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood‐ and Liver Stiffness‐Based Non‐Invasive Tests for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients With cACLD and HCC

Christoph C. Schwarz, Mattias Mandorfer, Patrick P. Starlinger, Peter Quehenberger et al.
Liver International
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Blood‐ and Liver Stiffness‐Based Non‐Invasive Tests for Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients With cACLD and HCC

Christoph C. Schwarz, Mattias Mandorfer, Patrick P. Starlinger, Peter Quehenberger, Benedikt Simbrunner, David Pereyra, Bernhard Scheiner, Stefan Stremitzer, Matthias Pinter, Klaus Kaczirek, Georg Semmler, Thomas Reiberger, Albert Friedrich Stättermayer, Mathias Jachs, Michael A Trauner, Lorenz Balcar, Tina Jasmin Haunold
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The applicability of non-invasive tests (NITs) for clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is controversial. We performed a head-to-head comparison of various NITs for CSPH and evaluated rule-in/-out criteria. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including 283 patients with HCC undergoing hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement at the Vienna Hepatic Haemodynamic Lab with available, same-day data on NITs (i.e., liver stiffness measurement [LSM], platelet count [PLT], von Willebrand factor antigen [VWF:Ag], and the ratio of VWF:Ag and PLT [VITRO]). For the subsequent analysis, we focused on patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). RESULTS: Among 164 patients with cACLD, most were BCLC 0/A (50.6%) and CSPH prevalence was 46.3%, the median LSM was 20.0 kPa (IQR: 13.3-37.9), and mean VWF:Ag/VITRO was 266 ± 119%/2.30 ± 1.81. The VITRO score yielded the highest discriminative ability to detect CSPH (AUROC: 0.834), followed by ANTICIPATE ± NASH (AUROC: 0.822), PLT (AUROC: 0.803), LSM (AUROC: 0.779), and VWF:Ag (AUROC: 0.707). The application of the Baveno VII criterium (LSM ≤ 15 kPa & PLT ≥ 150G/L) and the VITRO score (≤ 1.0) individually showed an excellent performance for ruling-out CSPH (sensitivities: ≥ 95%, NPV: 100%/87.9%). For ruling-in CSPH by individual criteria, the VITRO score provided the highest PPV (≥ 2.5, specificity/PPV: 89.8%/83.0%), followed by the Baveno VII criteria (specificity/PPV: 81.8%/74.6%). When sequentially applying Baveno VII criteria and VITRO, the grey zone could be significantly reduced to 16% (sensitivity/NPV: 94.7%/92.2%; specificity/PPV: 73.9%/84.4%). CONCLUSION: The discriminative ability in patients with cACLD and HCC was comparable to patients without HCC. However, PPVs of established criteria were < 90%, which may be explained by the comparatively low prevalence of CSPH in this context.

Liver InternationalVol. 46(11)
Mayo Clinic (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon