The adequacy of land acquisition planning documents as an instrument for legal risk mitigation at the preparatory stage for toll road land acquisition in West Sumatra

This article examines whether Indonesia’s normative framework for Land Acquisition Planning Documents (DPPT) adequately anticipates customary land and Indigenous community representation in toll-road acquisition in West Sumatra. This normative legal study uses statutory and conceptual approaches to analyse constitutional and agrarian guarantees, regional customary-land rules, land-registration provisions, and land-acquisition procedures. Because no project-specific DPPT was available, the article assesses the legal framework rather than the factual adequacy of a particular project document. Three findings emerge. First, the Constitution, the Basic Agrarian Law, West Sumatra Regional Regulation No. 7 of 2023, and Minister of ATR/BPN Regulation No. 14 of 2024 recognise customary-land interests but serve different functions. The regional regulation identifies nagari, suku, and kaum land and their customary leadership, while the national regulation governs administration and registration; ulayat rajo is not listed as a separate category in the 2023 regulation. Second, the Land Acquisition Law and Government Regulation No. 19 of 2021, as amended, provide mechanisms for preliminary data collection, public consultation, objections, and judicial review. DPPT information must be traceable to these later steps to be operationally useful. Third, DPPT can be strengthened through a tenure-information annex, representation records, data-status labels, a risk register, and a traceability matrix. These additions can initially be implemented through technical guidance within existing DPPT components, without making DPPT a land-right determination or creating a new consent requirement. The article concludes that the normative framework is developed but requires clearer information links between planning and preparation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law Administration and Social Science
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54957/jolas.v6i5.2456
Primary Topic
Land Rights and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The adequacy of land acquisition planning documents as an instrument for legal risk mitigation at the preparatory stage for toll road land acquisition in West Sumatra

Ilham Desri Satria
1 links
Journal of Law Administration and Social Science
Land Rights and Reforms
article

The adequacy of land acquisition planning documents as an instrument for legal risk mitigation at the preparatory stage for toll road land acquisition in West Sumatra

Ilham Desri Satria
article en

Abstract

This article examines whether Indonesia’s normative framework for Land Acquisition Planning Documents (DPPT) adequately anticipates customary land and Indigenous community representation in toll-road acquisition in West Sumatra. This normative legal study uses statutory and conceptual approaches to analyse constitutional and agrarian guarantees, regional customary-land rules, land-registration provisions, and land-acquisition procedures. Because no project-specific DPPT was available, the article assesses the legal framework rather than the factual adequacy of a particular project document. Three findings emerge. First, the Constitution, the Basic Agrarian Law, West Sumatra Regional Regulation No. 7 of 2023, and Minister of ATR/BPN Regulation No. 14 of 2024 recognise customary-land interests but serve different functions. The regional regulation identifies nagari, suku, and kaum land and their customary leadership, while the national regulation governs administration and registration; ulayat rajo is not listed as a separate category in the 2023 regulation. Second, the Land Acquisition Law and Government Regulation No. 19 of 2021, as amended, provide mechanisms for preliminary data collection, public consultation, objections, and judicial review. DPPT information must be traceable to these later steps to be operationally useful. Third, DPPT can be strengthened through a tenure-information annex, representation records, data-status labels, a risk register, and a traceability matrix. These additions can initially be implemented through technical guidance within existing DPPT components, without making DPPT a land-right determination or creating a new consent requirement. The article concludes that the normative framework is developed but requires clearer information links between planning and preparation.

Journal of Law Administration and Social ScienceVol. 6(5)
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Sustainable cities and communities, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Land Rights and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon