Fusion of multimodal ultrasound radiomics and deep learning for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

Background Differentiating benign from malignant breast masses remains challenging because grayscale morphology, vascularity, and tissue stiffness provide complementary information that is not fully captured by a single ultrasound modality. This study evaluated a diagnostic framework integrating multimodal ultrasound radiomics and deep learning. Methods A single-center retrospective patient-level dataset of pathologically classified breast masses included B-mode ultrasonography, color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), and shear wave elastography (SWE) with shear wave velocity (SWV) measurements. Clinical, conventional ultrasound, and quantitative SWV features were analyzed. Clinical, B-mode radiomics, multimodal radiomics, deep learning, and combined models were developed in a patient-level training set and evaluated in an internal test set. The internal hold-out test set comprised 135 patients, including 54 malignant and 81 benign lesions (40.0% malignant). Fivefold out-of-fold (OOF) predictions were generated within the training set for internal validation. Results Malignant lesions occurred in older patients, were larger, and showed more suspicious morphology, vascularity, and higher SWV than benign lesions.Fivefold OOF AUCs were 0.721, 0.842, 0.892, 0.920, and 0.928. In the internal test set, the respective AUCs were 0.768, 0.833, 0.901, 0.930, and 0.941. The combined model had the highest observed AUC (0.941, 95% CI 0.900-0.976) and the highest specificity (0.889); its sensitivity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 0.870, 0.881, 0.839, and 0.911, respectively. The combined model did not differ significantly from multimodal radiomics (Holm-adjusted P = 0.456) or deep learning (P = 0.698). Conclusion Score-level fusion of clinical information, multimodal ultrasound radiomics, and deep-learning features was evaluated for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. The combined approach showed the highest numerical AUC with nonsignificant differences relative to multimodal radiomics or deep learning after multiplicity adjustment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2026.102780
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fusion of multimodal ultrasound radiomics and deep learning for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

Yang Yang, X W Cui, Yuhang Cheng, Jingyi Sha et al.
Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Fusion of multimodal ultrasound radiomics and deep learning for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses

Yang Yang, X W Cui, Yuhang Cheng, Jingyi Sha, Ting Ma, Zhen Wang
article en

Abstract

Background Differentiating benign from malignant breast masses remains challenging because grayscale morphology, vascularity, and tissue stiffness provide complementary information that is not fully captured by a single ultrasound modality. This study evaluated a diagnostic framework integrating multimodal ultrasound radiomics and deep learning. Methods A single-center retrospective patient-level dataset of pathologically classified breast masses included B-mode ultrasonography, color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), and shear wave elastography (SWE) with shear wave velocity (SWV) measurements. Clinical, conventional ultrasound, and quantitative SWV features were analyzed. Clinical, B-mode radiomics, multimodal radiomics, deep learning, and combined models were developed in a patient-level training set and evaluated in an internal test set. The internal hold-out test set comprised 135 patients, including 54 malignant and 81 benign lesions (40.0% malignant). Fivefold out-of-fold (OOF) predictions were generated within the training set for internal validation. Results Malignant lesions occurred in older patients, were larger, and showed more suspicious morphology, vascularity, and higher SWV than benign lesions.Fivefold OOF AUCs were 0.721, 0.842, 0.892, 0.920, and 0.928. In the internal test set, the respective AUCs were 0.768, 0.833, 0.901, 0.930, and 0.941. The combined model had the highest observed AUC (0.941, 95% CI 0.900-0.976) and the highest specificity (0.889); its sensitivity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were 0.870, 0.881, 0.839, and 0.911, respectively. The combined model did not differ significantly from multimodal radiomics (Holm-adjusted P = 0.456) or deep learning (P = 0.698). Conclusion Score-level fusion of clinical information, multimodal ultrasound radiomics, and deep-learning features was evaluated for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses. The combined approach showed the highest numerical AUC with nonsignificant differences relative to multimodal radiomics or deep learning after multiplicity adjustment.

Journal of Radiation Research and Applied SciencesVol. 19(4)
First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University Medical College (CN), Tongji Hospital (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon