ON THE USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT TO EXTINGUISH FIRES AT OIL AND GAS FACILITIES

The article provides a systematic analysis of the possibilities of using heavy unmanned aerial vehicles to extinguish fires at oil and gas facilities, primarily at oil refineries and oil depots. The initial formulation of the problem is the high fire hazard of oil and petroleum products storage tanks and technological installations, which are characterized by intense heat generation (up to 150–200 kW/m2), complex fire scenarios (calm burning, boiling, release) and a high risk of fire spreading to neighboring tanks. It is shown that the existing stationary foam extinguishing systems in 18–22 % of cases of large fires are inoperable due to the destruction of pipelines, failure of pumping stations and a shortage of foaming agent, and the capabilities of ground equipment are limited by the height of supply and dangerous levels of thermal radiation. A comparative analysis of the technical characteristics of promising unmanned aerial vehicles samples (Volocopter VoloDrone, GRIFF 300, «Svarog‑Fireman», FireDrone‑R1). Based on the standard intensity of foam extinguishing (0,05 l/(m2·s), a method has been developed for calculating the required amount of UW for extinguishing a typical RVS‑5000 tank, taking into account the UW operation cycle, activity coefficient and consumption of extinguishing agent. It is shown that the use of UVS with on-board tanks for such tasks is economically and technically unrealistic (the need for up to 30 devices), whereas systems with a suspended sleeve provide the required flow rate for 1–2 units of equipment. The key limitations are considered: flight range and power supply, thermal stress, smoke and loss of visual navigation, explosive atmosphere, electromagnetic interference. On this basis, the requirements for specialized UVS for refineries are formulated (take-off weight 400–600 kg, range 80–100 km, temperature resistance up to 180–200 ℃, explosion protection Ex ia IIC T4, integration of LiDAR and thermal imagers).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problems of risk management in the technosphere
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61260/1998-8990-2026-3-96-104
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ON THE USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT TO EXTINGUISH FIRES AT OIL AND GAS FACILITIES

Yu. D. Motorygin, Nikita Silnikov, Maxim Sytdykov
Problems of risk management in the technosphere
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

ON THE USE OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT TO EXTINGUISH FIRES AT OIL AND GAS FACILITIES

Yu. D. Motorygin, Nikita Silnikov, Maxim Sytdykov
article en

Abstract

The article provides a systematic analysis of the possibilities of using heavy unmanned aerial vehicles to extinguish fires at oil and gas facilities, primarily at oil refineries and oil depots. The initial formulation of the problem is the high fire hazard of oil and petroleum products storage tanks and technological installations, which are characterized by intense heat generation (up to 150–200 kW/m2), complex fire scenarios (calm burning, boiling, release) and a high risk of fire spreading to neighboring tanks. It is shown that the existing stationary foam extinguishing systems in 18–22 % of cases of large fires are inoperable due to the destruction of pipelines, failure of pumping stations and a shortage of foaming agent, and the capabilities of ground equipment are limited by the height of supply and dangerous levels of thermal radiation. A comparative analysis of the technical characteristics of promising unmanned aerial vehicles samples (Volocopter VoloDrone, GRIFF 300, «Svarog‑Fireman», FireDrone‑R1). Based on the standard intensity of foam extinguishing (0,05 l/(m2·s), a method has been developed for calculating the required amount of UW for extinguishing a typical RVS‑5000 tank, taking into account the UW operation cycle, activity coefficient and consumption of extinguishing agent. It is shown that the use of UVS with on-board tanks for such tasks is economically and technically unrealistic (the need for up to 30 devices), whereas systems with a suspended sleeve provide the required flow rate for 1–2 units of equipment. The key limitations are considered: flight range and power supply, thermal stress, smoke and loss of visual navigation, explosive atmosphere, electromagnetic interference. On this basis, the requirements for specialized UVS for refineries are formulated (take-off weight 400–600 kg, range 80–100 km, temperature resistance up to 180–200 ℃, explosion protection Ex ia IIC T4, integration of LiDAR and thermal imagers).

Problems of risk management in the technosphereVol. 2026(3)
Academy of the State Fire Service EMERCOM of Russia (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon