Action theory and economic analysis in Scholastic and Austrian thought

Abstract The problem of interpreting standard economic analysis can be aided by the Scholastic and Austrian schools. The historical ties between Scholastic action theory and Austrian economic thought are deeper than mere affinities. The former seems to be a good ground for the latter to find its roots and flourish in traditional economic theory. A proper understanding of the relations between the will, the intellect, and the world establishes the a priori structure of economic theory. This theory can be understood as the intelligible form of economic activity, which provides ground for a methodology focused on the use of this structure in interpreting economic data. These relations derive not from folk psychology or analytic construction, but from an ontological view of acting persons. By providing a metaphysical ground for economic methodology, we show that natural and social sciences are not cut off from each other in separate worlds but are unified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Economics
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beag033
Primary Topic
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Action theory and economic analysis in Scholastic and Austrian thought

Nicolas C. Gonzalez
Cambridge Journal of Economics
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
article

Action theory and economic analysis in Scholastic and Austrian thought

Nicolas C. Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

Abstract The problem of interpreting standard economic analysis can be aided by the Scholastic and Austrian schools. The historical ties between Scholastic action theory and Austrian economic thought are deeper than mere affinities. The former seems to be a good ground for the latter to find its roots and flourish in traditional economic theory. A proper understanding of the relations between the will, the intellect, and the world establishes the a priori structure of economic theory. This theory can be understood as the intelligible form of economic activity, which provides ground for a methodology focused on the use of this structure in interpreting economic data. These relations derive not from folk psychology or analytic construction, but from an ontological view of acting persons. By providing a metaphysical ground for economic methodology, we show that natural and social sciences are not cut off from each other in separate worlds but are unified.

Cambridge Journal of Economics
University of Minnesota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical Economic and Legal Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon