Usability and Physician Acceptance of AI in Chest Radiography: An Evaluation of the MeDeep Platform Using SUS and ATRAI-14

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) architectures demonstrate high proficiency in chest radiography interpretation, yet successful clinical integration is often hampered by usability challenges and physician skepticism. This study evaluates the ergonomic usability and professional acceptance of the MeDeep AI platform among medical practitioners to identify key drivers of clinical trust. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted across hospitals in Kermanshah, evaluating 88 medical professionals, including attending radiologists, radiology residents, internal medicine physicians, and medical externs. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was utilized to measure the platform's ergonomic functionality (n=82), while the validated ATRAI-14 questionnaire quantified broader attitudes and trust regarding AI integration (n=88). Results: The MeDeep platform achieved a high mean SUS score of 84.93, indicating excellent usability uniformly experienced across all professional subgroups (p=0.387). However, overarching AI acceptance and algorithmic trust varied significantly by clinical role. Radiology residents exhibited significantly higher overarching AI acceptance (p=0.016) and algorithmic trust (p=0.008) compared to attending radiologists. Multivariate regression demonstrated that user familiarity (Beta=0.500, p<0.001) and perceived system usability (Beta=0.236, p=0.012) rather than years of clinical experience were the primary independent positive predictors of AI acceptance. Furthermore, higher perceived usability directly predicted greater algorithmic trust (Beta=0.282, p=0.009). Conclusion: While technical usability is a necessary baseline for diagnostic platforms, professional trust dictates ultimate clinical adoption. Overcoming the generational divide in AI acceptance requires developers to prioritize intuitive interface design and position AI as a workflow-augmenting tool that addresses administrative burdens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.23.26365338
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Usability and Physician Acceptance of AI in Chest Radiography: An Evaluation of the MeDeep Platform Using SUS and ATRAI-14

Mohammad Hossein Sharif, Mohammad Gharib Salehi, Mohammad Javad Gharegozlou, Mohammad Amin Amani et al.
medRxiv
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
preprint

Usability and Physician Acceptance of AI in Chest Radiography: An Evaluation of the MeDeep Platform Using SUS and ATRAI-14

Mohammad Hossein Sharif, Mohammad Gharib Salehi, Mohammad Javad Gharegozlou, Mohammad Amin Amani, Parand Shariat Rad, Shayan Salehi, Mohammad Mehdi Hatami
preprint en

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) architectures demonstrate high proficiency in chest radiography interpretation, yet successful clinical integration is often hampered by usability challenges and physician skepticism. This study evaluates the ergonomic usability and professional acceptance of the MeDeep AI platform among medical practitioners to identify key drivers of clinical trust. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted across hospitals in Kermanshah, evaluating 88 medical professionals, including attending radiologists, radiology residents, internal medicine physicians, and medical externs. The System Usability Scale (SUS) was utilized to measure the platform's ergonomic functionality (n=82), while the validated ATRAI-14 questionnaire quantified broader attitudes and trust regarding AI integration (n=88). Results: The MeDeep platform achieved a high mean SUS score of 84.93, indicating excellent usability uniformly experienced across all professional subgroups (p=0.387). However, overarching AI acceptance and algorithmic trust varied significantly by clinical role. Radiology residents exhibited significantly higher overarching AI acceptance (p=0.016) and algorithmic trust (p=0.008) compared to attending radiologists. Multivariate regression demonstrated that user familiarity (Beta=0.500, p<0.001) and perceived system usability (Beta=0.236, p=0.012) rather than years of clinical experience were the primary independent positive predictors of AI acceptance. Furthermore, higher perceived usability directly predicted greater algorithmic trust (Beta=0.282, p=0.009). Conclusion: While technical usability is a necessary baseline for diagnostic platforms, professional trust dictates ultimate clinical adoption. Overcoming the generational divide in AI acceptance requires developers to prioritize intuitive interface design and position AI as a workflow-augmenting tool that addresses administrative burdens.

medRxiv
Sharif University of Technology (IR), Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon