Revision surgery for osteochondral lesions of the talus: Are there predictive factors for successful surgery?

Abstract Purpose Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common injuries of the ankle associated with persistent pain and functional impairment. Revision procedures are frequent. Currently, objective criteria to guide revision decision-making remain limited. This retrospective study is designed to identify factors associated with patient-reported outcome after surgery pathways and to enhance selection of patients who may benefit from revision surgery in OLT. Methods Between 2015 and 2018, 64 patients underwent surgical treatment for OLT (97 procedures in total). A symptomatic subgroup of 21 patients required additional procedures (33 revision operations). Outcomes at a mean follow-up of 3 years were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Primary outcome was a patient-level PROM-based classification (Success/ Partial relief/No relief) at follow-up. Analyses were performed per patient; procedure counts were reported descriptively. Results Of 64 patients, 43 (67%) achieved a successful outcome after a single procedure, whereas 21 (33%) required multiple procedures. In the multiple-surgery group, 9/21 (43%) were classified as Success at follow-up. PROM categories in follow up correlated significantly with AOFAS, VAS, and FAOS. A longer interval (> 24 months) between procedures might be associated with a higher likelihood of a habituation effect at follow-up. Conclusion PROM-based classification provides a patient-centered assessment of outcome after revision pathways for OLT. The FAOS score subdomains proved particularly valuable in identifying specific issues that could justify a revision. The waiting time between surgeries appears relevant and should be considered when planning revision surgery. Our data suggests that a longer interval between surgeries (exceeding 24 months) might be associated with habituation effects and adaptation processes, leading to a reduction in periarticular swelling and the continuation of physiotherapy. Despite moderate success rates, the treatment of OLT remains challenging, and preoperative factors such as age and activity level should be considered when evaluating the chances of success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-07264-7
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revision surgery for osteochondral lesions of the talus: Are there predictive factors for successful surgery?

Thaqif El Khassawna, Nike Walter, Christine Antonie Heiss, Christoph Biehl et al.
2 links
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Revision surgery for osteochondral lesions of the talus: Are there predictive factors for successful surgery?

Thaqif El Khassawna, Nike Walter, Christine Antonie Heiss, Christoph Biehl, Lotta Biehl, Markus Rupp, Carina Fritzsche
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common injuries of the ankle associated with persistent pain and functional impairment. Revision procedures are frequent. Currently, objective criteria to guide revision decision-making remain limited. This retrospective study is designed to identify factors associated with patient-reported outcome after surgery pathways and to enhance selection of patients who may benefit from revision surgery in OLT. Methods Between 2015 and 2018, 64 patients underwent surgical treatment for OLT (97 procedures in total). A symptomatic subgroup of 21 patients required additional procedures (33 revision operations). Outcomes at a mean follow-up of 3 years were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Primary outcome was a patient-level PROM-based classification (Success/ Partial relief/No relief) at follow-up. Analyses were performed per patient; procedure counts were reported descriptively. Results Of 64 patients, 43 (67%) achieved a successful outcome after a single procedure, whereas 21 (33%) required multiple procedures. In the multiple-surgery group, 9/21 (43%) were classified as Success at follow-up. PROM categories in follow up correlated significantly with AOFAS, VAS, and FAOS. A longer interval (> 24 months) between procedures might be associated with a higher likelihood of a habituation effect at follow-up. Conclusion PROM-based classification provides a patient-centered assessment of outcome after revision pathways for OLT. The FAOS score subdomains proved particularly valuable in identifying specific issues that could justify a revision. The waiting time between surgeries appears relevant and should be considered when planning revision surgery. Our data suggests that a longer interval between surgeries (exceeding 24 months) might be associated with habituation effects and adaptation processes, leading to a reduction in periarticular swelling and the continuation of physiotherapy. Despite moderate success rates, the treatment of OLT remains challenging, and preoperative factors such as age and activity level should be considered when evaluating the chances of success.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
University of Jordan (JO), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), University Hospital Regensburg (DE), Biruni University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon