Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning

Machine Learning Abstract Machine Learning is an important part to this area. Prediction of cardiovascular diseases but not so much for perforation. Mance should be considered within its relation to a particular dataset or application domain. Definition of definition and Validation process. This study demonstrates And evaluates a model for predicting cardiovascular risks from prototypes to models. The prediction app was created by developing it on streamlit website. There are 1000 synthetic records of demographics for this project. physiological, laboratory, clinical and lifestyle variables and can Extract 4 more relevant to risks for this model. . Data is divided by means of an 80-20 stratified train test split. After that Logistic Regression, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting. Classifier boosting models are initialized from an arbitrary starting point of a given random seed value. The model performance was evaluated on a 200 record dataset where it had an accuracy rate of. 0.8800, 0.9050, and 0.8900 with an ROC-AUC score of 0.9542. 0.9615 and 0.9641 respectively. Random Forest achieved the Highest accuracy, precision, specificity, and F1-score compared to others. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest ROC-AUC. Analysis of The implementation shows an overall risk for this product. GradientBoosting score is shown instead of an average value for it. true ensemble prediction. While these models are good at predicting outcomes. On a dataset generated from an identical artificial intelligence model, these are. Results are not reliable for diagnosis nor of clinical value. in real patients. Therefore, it is better to consider this as an app. an educational machine-learning prototype and a reproducible Foundations of future studies on ethically obtained medical data. Data analysis, calibration evaluation, and external verification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23667284
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning

Kathiresh P, D. Mohanapriya, Kumuthaveni R
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Cardiovascular Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning

Kathiresh P, D. Mohanapriya, Kumuthaveni R
article en

Abstract

Machine Learning Abstract Machine Learning is an important part to this area. Prediction of cardiovascular diseases but not so much for perforation. Mance should be considered within its relation to a particular dataset or application domain. Definition of definition and Validation process. This study demonstrates And evaluates a model for predicting cardiovascular risks from prototypes to models. The prediction app was created by developing it on streamlit website. There are 1000 synthetic records of demographics for this project. physiological, laboratory, clinical and lifestyle variables and can Extract 4 more relevant to risks for this model. . Data is divided by means of an 80-20 stratified train test split. After that Logistic Regression, Random Forest and Gradient Boosting. Classifier boosting models are initialized from an arbitrary starting point of a given random seed value. The model performance was evaluated on a 200 record dataset where it had an accuracy rate of. 0.8800, 0.9050, and 0.8900 with an ROC-AUC score of 0.9542. 0.9615 and 0.9641 respectively. Random Forest achieved the Highest accuracy, precision, specificity, and F1-score compared to others. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest ROC-AUC. Analysis of The implementation shows an overall risk for this product. GradientBoosting score is shown instead of an average value for it. true ensemble prediction. While these models are good at predicting outcomes. On a dataset generated from an identical artificial intelligence model, these are. Results are not reliable for diagnosis nor of clinical value. in real patients. Therefore, it is better to consider this as an app. an educational machine-learning prototype and a reproducible Foundations of future studies on ethically obtained medical data. Data analysis, calibration evaluation, and external verification.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon